Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis

<p><strong>Objective.</strong> Patient self-report scales are invaluable in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as they allow physicians to rapidly assess patient perspectives of disease activity. We aimed to assess the agreement of the visual analog scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line, a...

Full beskrivning

Bibliografiska uppgifter
Huvudupphovsmän: Ye, W, Hackett, S, Vandevelde, C, Twigg, S, Helliwell, PS, Coates, LC
Materialtyp: Journal article
Språk:English
Publicerad: Journal of Rheumatology 2021
_version_ 1826307526129352704
author Ye, W
Hackett, S
Vandevelde, C
Twigg, S
Helliwell, PS
Coates, LC
author_facet Ye, W
Hackett, S
Vandevelde, C
Twigg, S
Helliwell, PS
Coates, LC
author_sort Ye, W
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Objective.</strong> Patient self-report scales are invaluable in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as they allow physicians to rapidly assess patient perspectives of disease activity. We aimed to assess the agreement of the visual analog scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line, and the numerical rating scale (NRS), a 21-point scale ranging from 0 to 10 in increments of 0.5, in patients with PsA.</p> <p><strong>Methods.</strong> Data were collected prospectively across 3 UK hospital trusts from 2018 to 2019. All patients completed the VAS and NRS for pain, arthritis, skin psoriasis (PsO), and global disease activity. A subset completed an identical pack 1 week later. Demographic and clinical data were also collected. Agreement was assessed using medians and the Bland-Altman method. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess test-retest reliability. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess dependency between scale scores and clinical variables.</p> <p><strong>Results.</strong> Two hundred ten patients completed the study; 1 withdrew consent. Thus, 209 were analyzed. For pain, arthritis, skin PsO, and global disease activity, the difference between the VAS and NRS lay mostly within 1.96 SD of the mean, suggesting reasonable agreement between the 2 scales. Among the patients, 64.1% preferred the NRS. The ICCs demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability for both VAS and NRS. Higher VAS and NRS scores were associated with increased tender/swollen joint count, poorer functional status, and greater life impact.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> The VAS and NRS show reasonable agreement in key patient-reported outcomes in PsA. Results from both scales are correlated with disease severity and life impact.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:04:25Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:33f91afa-c6e5-45ba-a1a7-2704eb5a30d4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:04:25Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Journal of Rheumatology
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:33f91afa-c6e5-45ba-a1a7-2704eb5a30d42022-04-29T07:34:02ZComparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:33f91afa-c6e5-45ba-a1a7-2704eb5a30d4EnglishSymplectic ElementsJournal of Rheumatology2021Ye, WHackett, SVandevelde, CTwigg, SHelliwell, PSCoates, LC<p><strong>Objective.</strong> Patient self-report scales are invaluable in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as they allow physicians to rapidly assess patient perspectives of disease activity. We aimed to assess the agreement of the visual analog scale (VAS), a 100-mm horizontal line, and the numerical rating scale (NRS), a 21-point scale ranging from 0 to 10 in increments of 0.5, in patients with PsA.</p> <p><strong>Methods.</strong> Data were collected prospectively across 3 UK hospital trusts from 2018 to 2019. All patients completed the VAS and NRS for pain, arthritis, skin psoriasis (PsO), and global disease activity. A subset completed an identical pack 1 week later. Demographic and clinical data were also collected. Agreement was assessed using medians and the Bland-Altman method. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess test-retest reliability. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess dependency between scale scores and clinical variables.</p> <p><strong>Results.</strong> Two hundred ten patients completed the study; 1 withdrew consent. Thus, 209 were analyzed. For pain, arthritis, skin PsO, and global disease activity, the difference between the VAS and NRS lay mostly within 1.96 SD of the mean, suggesting reasonable agreement between the 2 scales. Among the patients, 64.1% preferred the NRS. The ICCs demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability for both VAS and NRS. Higher VAS and NRS scores were associated with increased tender/swollen joint count, poorer functional status, and greater life impact.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> The VAS and NRS show reasonable agreement in key patient-reported outcomes in PsA. Results from both scales are correlated with disease severity and life impact.</p>
spellingShingle Ye, W
Hackett, S
Vandevelde, C
Twigg, S
Helliwell, PS
Coates, LC
Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
title Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
title_full Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
title_fullStr Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
title_short Comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient-reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
title_sort comparing the visual analogue scale and the numerical rating scale in patient reported outcomes in psoriatic arthritis
work_keys_str_mv AT yew comparingthevisualanaloguescaleandthenumericalratingscaleinpatientreportedoutcomesinpsoriaticarthritis
AT hacketts comparingthevisualanaloguescaleandthenumericalratingscaleinpatientreportedoutcomesinpsoriaticarthritis
AT vandeveldec comparingthevisualanaloguescaleandthenumericalratingscaleinpatientreportedoutcomesinpsoriaticarthritis
AT twiggs comparingthevisualanaloguescaleandthenumericalratingscaleinpatientreportedoutcomesinpsoriaticarthritis
AT helliwellps comparingthevisualanaloguescaleandthenumericalratingscaleinpatientreportedoutcomesinpsoriaticarthritis
AT coateslc comparingthevisualanaloguescaleandthenumericalratingscaleinpatientreportedoutcomesinpsoriaticarthritis