God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser
Professor Feser’s contribution to the philosophical conversation he presents is particularly congenial to any theologian working in the tradition of Thomas Aquinas, where Aristotelian notions of causality and teleology serve extensively, and so it is from the perspective of Aquinas’s theology that I...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology
2016
|
| _version_ | 1797062145184104448 |
|---|---|
| author | Gaine, S |
| author_facet | Gaine, S |
| author_sort | Gaine, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Professor Feser’s contribution to the philosophical conversation he presents is particularly congenial to any theologian working in the tradition of Thomas Aquinas, where Aristotelian notions of causality and teleology serve extensively, and so it is from the perspective of Aquinas’s theology that I am going to reply to one of Professor Feser’s points about the theological implications of his philosophical position. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:41:23Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3466d038-6eb5-46a6-8b95-11615094d294 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:41:23Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | St. Paul Center for Biblical Theology |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3466d038-6eb5-46a6-8b95-11615094d2942022-03-26T13:25:47ZGod is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward FeserJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3466d038-6eb5-46a6-8b95-11615094d294Symplectic Elements at OxfordSt. Paul Center for Biblical Theology2016Gaine, SProfessor Feser’s contribution to the philosophical conversation he presents is particularly congenial to any theologian working in the tradition of Thomas Aquinas, where Aristotelian notions of causality and teleology serve extensively, and so it is from the perspective of Aquinas’s theology that I am going to reply to one of Professor Feser’s points about the theological implications of his philosophical position. |
| spellingShingle | Gaine, S God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser |
| title | God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser |
| title_full | God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser |
| title_fullStr | God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser |
| title_full_unstemmed | God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser |
| title_short | God is an Artificer: A Reply to Professor Edward Feser |
| title_sort | god is an artificer a reply to professor edward feser |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gaines godisanartificerareplytoprofessoredwardfeser |