Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?

We show that when ecologists act as reviewers their reported rejection rates recommended for manuscripts increases with their publication frequency in high impact factor journals. Rejection rate however does not relate to reviewer age. These results indicate that the likelihood of getting a paper ac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aarssen, L, Lortie, C, Budden, A, Koricheva, J, Leimu, R, Tregenza, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2009
Subjects:
_version_ 1797062256808165376
author Aarssen, L
Lortie, C
Budden, A
Koricheva, J
Leimu, R
Tregenza, T
author_facet Aarssen, L
Lortie, C
Budden, A
Koricheva, J
Leimu, R
Tregenza, T
author_sort Aarssen, L
collection OXFORD
description We show that when ecologists act as reviewers their reported rejection rates recommended for manuscripts increases with their publication frequency in high impact factor journals. Rejection rate however does not relate to reviewer age. These results indicate that the likelihood of getting a paper accepted for publication may depend upon factors in addition to scientific merit. Multiple reviewer selection for a given manuscript therefore should consider not only appropriate expertise, but also reviewers that have variable publication experience with a range of different journals to ensure balanced treatment. Interestingly since age did not relate to rejection rates, more senior scientists are not necessarily more jaded in reviewing practices.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:42:56Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:34dc83e9-c058-488a-b59b-06b999b074ed
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:42:56Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:34dc83e9-c058-488a-b59b-06b999b074ed2022-03-26T13:28:44ZDoes publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:34dc83e9-c058-488a-b59b-06b999b074edBiologyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetPublic Library of Science2009Aarssen, LLortie, CBudden, AKoricheva, JLeimu, RTregenza, TWe show that when ecologists act as reviewers their reported rejection rates recommended for manuscripts increases with their publication frequency in high impact factor journals. Rejection rate however does not relate to reviewer age. These results indicate that the likelihood of getting a paper accepted for publication may depend upon factors in addition to scientific merit. Multiple reviewer selection for a given manuscript therefore should consider not only appropriate expertise, but also reviewers that have variable publication experience with a range of different journals to ensure balanced treatment. Interestingly since age did not relate to rejection rates, more senior scientists are not necessarily more jaded in reviewing practices.
spellingShingle Biology
Aarssen, L
Lortie, C
Budden, A
Koricheva, J
Leimu, R
Tregenza, T
Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
title Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
title_full Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
title_fullStr Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
title_full_unstemmed Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
title_short Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
title_sort does publication in top tier journals affect reviewer behavior
topic Biology
work_keys_str_mv AT aarssenl doespublicationintoptierjournalsaffectreviewerbehavior
AT lortiec doespublicationintoptierjournalsaffectreviewerbehavior
AT buddena doespublicationintoptierjournalsaffectreviewerbehavior
AT korichevaj doespublicationintoptierjournalsaffectreviewerbehavior
AT leimur doespublicationintoptierjournalsaffectreviewerbehavior
AT tregenzat doespublicationintoptierjournalsaffectreviewerbehavior