Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?

Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?

Show other versions (1)

We show that when ecologists act as reviewers their reported rejection rates recommended for manuscripts increases with their publication frequency in high impact factor journals. Rejection rate however does not relate to reviewer age. These results indicate that the likelihood of getting a paper ac...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Main Authors:	Aarssen, L, Lortie, C, Budden, A, Koricheva, J, Leimu, R, Tregenza, T
Format:	Journal article
Sprog:	English
Udgivet:	Public Library of Science 2009
Fag:	Biology

Lignende værker

Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
af: Aarssen, L, et al.
Udgivet: (2009)

Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior?
af: Lonnie W Aarssen, et al.
Udgivet: (2009-01-01)

Does double-blind review favor female authors? Reply
af: Budden, A, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

Does it pay to have a "bigwig" as a co-author?
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

Publication bias and merit in ecology
af: Lortie, C, et al.
Udgivet: (2007)

Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors.
af: Budden, A, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

Response to Webb et al.: Double-blind review: accept with minor revisions
af: Budden, A, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

How big are bigwigs?: a reply to Havens
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

Response to Whittaker: challenges in testing for gender bias
af: Budden, A, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

To Name or Not to Name: The Effect of Changing Author Gender on Peer Review
af: Borsuk, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2009)

Systematic variation in reviewer practice according to country and gender in the field of ecology and evolution.
af: Grod, O, et al.
Udgivet: (2008)

Systematic variation in reviewer practice according to country and gender in the field of ecology and evolution.
af: Olyana N Grod, et al.
Udgivet: (2008-01-01)

Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology
af: Lortie, C, et al.
Udgivet: (2012)

Do citations and impact factors relate to the real numbers in publications? A case study of citation rates, impact, and effect sizes in ecology and evolutionary biology.
af: Lortie, C, et al.
Udgivet: (2013)

The influence of author gender, national language and number of authors on citation rate in ecology
af: Borsuk, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2009)

Science Open Reviewed: An online community connecting authors with reviewers for journals
af: Lonnie Aarssen, et al.
Udgivet: (2012-11-01)

Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles?
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2005)

Ending elitism in peer-review publication
af: Lonnie W Aarssen, et al.
Udgivet: (2009-12-01)

Judging the quality of our research: a self-assessment test
af: L. W. Aarssen, et al.
Udgivet: (2010-03-01)

Cumulative meta-analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology.
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2004)

Conflict of Interest Disclosure in a Top-Tier Portuguese Medical Journal
af: Nuno Moreira Fonseca
Udgivet: (2017-09-01)

Bibliographic Measures of Top-Tier Finance, Information Systems, and Management Science Journals
af: Thomas Krueger, et al.
Udgivet: (2021-06-01)

Editorial: RECADM and the non-hegemonic strategy of becoming a top tier journal
af: Luciano Rossoni
Udgivet: (2021-01-01)

Position of in the scholarly journal network based on bibliometrics and developmental strategies for it to become a top-tier journal
af: Sun Huh
Udgivet: (2020-07-01)

Suggestions for Exercise Science's Promotion to a Top-Tier Journal in the Category of Sports Science
af: Sun Huh
Udgivet: (2022-08-01)

With great power comes great responsibility: the importance of rejection, power, and editors in the practice of scientific publishing.
af: Christopher J Lortie, et al.
Udgivet: (2013-01-01)

A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2012)

A meta-analysis of genetic correlations between plant resistances to multiple enemies.
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2006)

What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2005)

The contribution of authors from low- and middle-income countries to top-tier mental health journals
af: Joseph El Khoury, et al.
Udgivet: (2021-10-01)

Letter to the Editor: More on Conflict of Interest Disclosure in a Top-Tier Portuguese Medical Journal
af: João Gama Marques
Udgivet: (2018-08-01)

The top tier of the Big Five does not predict police decisions in ambiguous and high-pressure situations
af: Ricardo Tejeiro, et al.
Udgivet: (2024-12-01)

Marking the inclusion of the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing in PubMed Central and strategies to be promoted to a top-tier journal in the nursing category
af: Sun Huh
Udgivet: (2022-09-01)

Ideas for judging merit in manuscripts and authors
af: Lonnie Aarssen, et al.
Udgivet: (2010-12-01)

Does pharmaceutical advertising affect journal publication about dietary supplements?
af: Hood Kaylene L, et al.
Udgivet: (2008-04-01)

Verifiable Top- Query Processing in Tiered Mobile Sensor Networks
af: Fangju Liu, et al.
Udgivet: (2015-10-01)

Altmetric vs. Citations: An In-Depth Analysis of Top-tier Cancer Research
af: Mohammad Ahmadian, et al.
Udgivet: (2024-04-01)

How general are positive relationships between plant population size, fitness and genetic variation?
af: Leimu, R, et al.
Udgivet: (2006)

Three Tiers to biological escape velocity: The quest to outwit aging
af: Raymond D. Palmer
Udgivet: (2022-12-01)

Changing Answers in Multiple-Choice Exam Questions: Patterns of TOP-Tier Versus BOTTOM-Tier Students in Podiatric Medical School
af: Grant Yonemoto, et al.
Udgivet: (2023-06-01)