Muhammad as an episcopal figure

The Medinan stratum of the Qurʾān ascribes to Muḥammad a noticeably elevated status and a far wider range of functions than the earlier Meccan layer. Although this shift may well have responded to, and been facilitated by, historical circumstances, it is nonetheless appropriate to inquire whether sp...

Повний опис

Бібліографічні деталі
Автор: Sinai, N
Формат: Journal article
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Brill Academic Publishers 2018
_version_ 1826266714340327424
author Sinai, N
author_facet Sinai, N
author_sort Sinai, N
collection OXFORD
description The Medinan stratum of the Qurʾān ascribes to Muḥammad a noticeably elevated status and a far wider range of functions than the earlier Meccan layer. Although this shift may well have responded to, and been facilitated by, historical circumstances, it is nonetheless appropriate to inquire whether specific aspects of it might be drawing on pre-Qurʾānic precedents. I argue that the Christian episcopate, arguably the most widespread type of urban religious leadership in late antiquity, yields a surprising number of close overlaps with the Medinan presentation of the function and authority of Muḥammad. In tandem with this assessment, however, the article also considers important differences between the figure of Muḥammad and that of the Christian bishop. The most important such divergence consists in the fact that the Qurʾānic Messenger, unlike a Christian bishop, does not owe his authority to ordination by an ecclesiastical hierarchy: Muḥammad does not occupy an office that imparts authority independently of the person occupying it.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:43:10Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:34ef078e-0bb9-422e-8fd7-a42c8d1bdf1b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:43:10Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Brill Academic Publishers
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:34ef078e-0bb9-422e-8fd7-a42c8d1bdf1b2022-03-26T13:29:16ZMuhammad as an episcopal figureJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:34ef078e-0bb9-422e-8fd7-a42c8d1bdf1bEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBrill Academic Publishers2018Sinai, NThe Medinan stratum of the Qurʾān ascribes to Muḥammad a noticeably elevated status and a far wider range of functions than the earlier Meccan layer. Although this shift may well have responded to, and been facilitated by, historical circumstances, it is nonetheless appropriate to inquire whether specific aspects of it might be drawing on pre-Qurʾānic precedents. I argue that the Christian episcopate, arguably the most widespread type of urban religious leadership in late antiquity, yields a surprising number of close overlaps with the Medinan presentation of the function and authority of Muḥammad. In tandem with this assessment, however, the article also considers important differences between the figure of Muḥammad and that of the Christian bishop. The most important such divergence consists in the fact that the Qurʾānic Messenger, unlike a Christian bishop, does not owe his authority to ordination by an ecclesiastical hierarchy: Muḥammad does not occupy an office that imparts authority independently of the person occupying it.
spellingShingle Sinai, N
Muhammad as an episcopal figure
title Muhammad as an episcopal figure
title_full Muhammad as an episcopal figure
title_fullStr Muhammad as an episcopal figure
title_full_unstemmed Muhammad as an episcopal figure
title_short Muhammad as an episcopal figure
title_sort muhammad as an episcopal figure
work_keys_str_mv AT sinain muhammadasanepiscopalfigure