More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!

The strength of the learned relation between two events, a model for causal perception, has been found to depend on their overall statistical relation, and might be expected to be related to both training trial frequency and trial duration. We report five experiments using a rapid-trial streaming pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Murphy, RA, Witnauer, J, Castiello, S, Tsvetkov, A, Li, A, Alcaide, DM, Miller, RR
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: American Psychological Association 2021
_version_ 1797106675333726208
author Murphy, RA
Witnauer, J
Castiello, S
Tsvetkov, A
Li, A
Alcaide, DM
Miller, RR
author_facet Murphy, RA
Witnauer, J
Castiello, S
Tsvetkov, A
Li, A
Alcaide, DM
Miller, RR
author_sort Murphy, RA
collection OXFORD
description The strength of the learned relation between two events, a model for causal perception, has been found to depend on their overall statistical relation, and might be expected to be related to both training trial frequency and trial duration. We report five experiments using a rapid-trial streaming procedure containing Event 1-Event 2 pairings (A trials), Event1-alone (B trials), Event2-alone (C trials), and neither event (D trials), in which trial frequencies and durations were independently varied. Judgements of association increased with increasing frequencies of A trials and decreased with increasing frequencies of both B and C trials, but showed little effect of frequency of D trials. Across five experiments, a weak but often significant effect of trial duration was also detected, which was always in the same direction as trial frequency. Thus, both frequency and duration of trials influenced learning, but frequency had decidedly stronger effects. Importantly, the benefit of more trials greatly outweighed the observed reduction in effect size caused by a proportional decrease in trial duration. In Experiment 5, more trials of proportionately shorter duration enhanced effects on contingency judgements despite a shortening of the training session. We consider the observed ‘frequency advantage’ with respect to both frequentist models of learning and models based on information.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:05:57Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:354067a0-1768-402a-8a73-45b1fccfe9f4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:05:57Z
publishDate 2021
publisher American Psychological Association
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:354067a0-1768-402a-8a73-45b1fccfe9f42022-05-09T08:17:49ZMore frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:354067a0-1768-402a-8a73-45b1fccfe9f4EnglishSymplectic ElementsAmerican Psychological Association2021Murphy, RAWitnauer, JCastiello, STsvetkov, ALi, AAlcaide, DMMiller, RRThe strength of the learned relation between two events, a model for causal perception, has been found to depend on their overall statistical relation, and might be expected to be related to both training trial frequency and trial duration. We report five experiments using a rapid-trial streaming procedure containing Event 1-Event 2 pairings (A trials), Event1-alone (B trials), Event2-alone (C trials), and neither event (D trials), in which trial frequencies and durations were independently varied. Judgements of association increased with increasing frequencies of A trials and decreased with increasing frequencies of both B and C trials, but showed little effect of frequency of D trials. Across five experiments, a weak but often significant effect of trial duration was also detected, which was always in the same direction as trial frequency. Thus, both frequency and duration of trials influenced learning, but frequency had decidedly stronger effects. Importantly, the benefit of more trials greatly outweighed the observed reduction in effect size caused by a proportional decrease in trial duration. In Experiment 5, more trials of proportionately shorter duration enhanced effects on contingency judgements despite a shortening of the training session. We consider the observed ‘frequency advantage’ with respect to both frequentist models of learning and models based on information.
spellingShingle Murphy, RA
Witnauer, J
Castiello, S
Tsvetkov, A
Li, A
Alcaide, DM
Miller, RR
More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
title More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
title_full More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
title_fullStr More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
title_full_unstemmed More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
title_short More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
title_sort more frequent shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session there is a free lunch
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyra morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch
AT witnauerj morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch
AT castiellos morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch
AT tsvetkova morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch
AT lia morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch
AT alcaidedm morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch
AT millerrr morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch