More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!
The strength of the learned relation between two events, a model for causal perception, has been found to depend on their overall statistical relation, and might be expected to be related to both training trial frequency and trial duration. We report five experiments using a rapid-trial streaming pr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Psychological Association
2021
|
_version_ | 1797106675333726208 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, RA Witnauer, J Castiello, S Tsvetkov, A Li, A Alcaide, DM Miller, RR |
author_facet | Murphy, RA Witnauer, J Castiello, S Tsvetkov, A Li, A Alcaide, DM Miller, RR |
author_sort | Murphy, RA |
collection | OXFORD |
description | The strength of the learned relation between two events, a model for causal perception, has been found to depend on their overall statistical relation, and might be expected to be related to both training trial frequency and trial duration. We report five experiments using a rapid-trial streaming procedure containing Event 1-Event 2 pairings (A trials), Event1-alone (B trials), Event2-alone (C trials), and neither event (D trials), in which trial frequencies and durations were independently varied. Judgements of association increased with increasing frequencies of A trials and decreased with increasing frequencies of both B and C trials, but showed little effect of frequency of D trials. Across five experiments, a weak but often significant effect of trial duration was also detected, which was always in the same direction as trial frequency. Thus, both frequency and duration of trials influenced learning, but frequency had decidedly stronger effects. Importantly, the benefit of more trials greatly outweighed the observed reduction in effect size caused by a proportional decrease in trial duration. In Experiment 5, more trials of proportionately shorter duration enhanced effects on contingency judgements despite a shortening of the training session. We consider the observed ‘frequency advantage’ with respect to both frequentist models of learning and models based on information. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:05:57Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:354067a0-1768-402a-8a73-45b1fccfe9f4 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:05:57Z |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Psychological Association |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:354067a0-1768-402a-8a73-45b1fccfe9f42022-05-09T08:17:49ZMore frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch!Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:354067a0-1768-402a-8a73-45b1fccfe9f4EnglishSymplectic ElementsAmerican Psychological Association2021Murphy, RAWitnauer, JCastiello, STsvetkov, ALi, AAlcaide, DMMiller, RRThe strength of the learned relation between two events, a model for causal perception, has been found to depend on their overall statistical relation, and might be expected to be related to both training trial frequency and trial duration. We report five experiments using a rapid-trial streaming procedure containing Event 1-Event 2 pairings (A trials), Event1-alone (B trials), Event2-alone (C trials), and neither event (D trials), in which trial frequencies and durations were independently varied. Judgements of association increased with increasing frequencies of A trials and decreased with increasing frequencies of both B and C trials, but showed little effect of frequency of D trials. Across five experiments, a weak but often significant effect of trial duration was also detected, which was always in the same direction as trial frequency. Thus, both frequency and duration of trials influenced learning, but frequency had decidedly stronger effects. Importantly, the benefit of more trials greatly outweighed the observed reduction in effect size caused by a proportional decrease in trial duration. In Experiment 5, more trials of proportionately shorter duration enhanced effects on contingency judgements despite a shortening of the training session. We consider the observed ‘frequency advantage’ with respect to both frequentist models of learning and models based on information. |
spellingShingle | Murphy, RA Witnauer, J Castiello, S Tsvetkov, A Li, A Alcaide, DM Miller, RR More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch! |
title | More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch! |
title_full | More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch! |
title_fullStr | More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch! |
title_full_unstemmed | More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch! |
title_short | More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: there is a free lunch! |
title_sort | more frequent shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session there is a free lunch |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphyra morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch AT witnauerj morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch AT castiellos morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch AT tsvetkova morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch AT lia morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch AT alcaidedm morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch AT millerrr morefrequentshortertrialsenhanceacquisitioninatrainingsessionthereisafreelunch |