GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency.
This article deals with inconsistency of relative (rather than absolute) treatment effects in binary/dichotomous outcomes. A body of evidence is not rated up in quality if studies yield consistent results, but may be rated down in quality if inconsistent. Criteria for evaluating consistency include...
Main Authors: | Guyatt, G, Oxman, A, Kunz, R, Woodcock, J, Brozek, J, Helfand, M, Alonso-Coello, P, Glasziou, P, Jaeschke, R, Akl, E, Norris, S, Vist, G, Dahm, P, Shukla, V, Higgins, J, Falck-Ytter, Y, Schünemann, H |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2011
|
Similar Items
-
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
by: Guyatt, G, et al.
Published: (2011) -
GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence.
by: Guyatt, G, et al.
Published: (2011) -
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes.
by: Guyatt, G, et al.
Published: (2011) -
GRADE: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
by: Schünemann, H, et al.
Published: (2008) -
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes.
by: Guyatt, G, et al.
Published: (2013)