Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice

A mixed bag of poorly evaluated methods leaves patients frustrated, and doctors little wiser

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coulter, A
Format: Journal article
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
_version_ 1797062374017990656
author Coulter, A
author_facet Coulter, A
author_sort Coulter, A
collection OXFORD
description A mixed bag of poorly evaluated methods leaves patients frustrated, and doctors little wiser
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:44:37Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:35730a44-afa6-4f9b-9fc8-bef585c66d35
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:44:37Z
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:35730a44-afa6-4f9b-9fc8-bef585c66d352022-03-26T13:32:01ZPatient feedback for quality improvement in general practiceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:35730a44-afa6-4f9b-9fc8-bef585c66d35Symplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing Group2016Coulter, AA mixed bag of poorly evaluated methods leaves patients frustrated, and doctors little wiser
spellingShingle Coulter, A
Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
title Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
title_full Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
title_fullStr Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
title_short Patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
title_sort patient feedback for quality improvement in general practice
work_keys_str_mv AT coultera patientfeedbackforqualityimprovementingeneralpractice