The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study
Propensity scores (PS) are typically estimated using logistic regression (LR). Machine learning techniques such as random forests (RF) have been suggested as promising alternatives for variable selection and PS estimation.
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference item |
| Published: |
Wiley
2017
|
| _version_ | 1826266961812652032 |
|---|---|
| author | Ali, M Khalid, S Collins, G Prieto-Alhambra, D |
| author_facet | Ali, M Khalid, S Collins, G Prieto-Alhambra, D |
| author_sort | Ali, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Propensity scores (PS) are typically estimated using logistic regression (LR). Machine learning techniques such as random forests (RF) have been suggested as promising alternatives for variable selection and PS estimation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:46:54Z |
| format | Conference item |
| id | oxford-uuid:3636bc63-91a7-4625-85e6-15f2375745c5 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:46:54Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3636bc63-91a7-4625-85e6-15f2375745c52022-03-26T13:36:29ZThe comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation studyConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:3636bc63-91a7-4625-85e6-15f2375745c5Symplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2017Ali, MKhalid, SCollins, GPrieto-Alhambra, DPropensity scores (PS) are typically estimated using logistic regression (LR). Machine learning techniques such as random forests (RF) have been suggested as promising alternatives for variable selection and PS estimation. |
| spellingShingle | Ali, M Khalid, S Collins, G Prieto-Alhambra, D The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study |
| title | The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study |
| title_full | The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study |
| title_fullStr | The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study |
| title_full_unstemmed | The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study |
| title_short | The comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods: A simulation study |
| title_sort | comparative performance of logistic regression and random forest in propensity score methods a simulation study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alim thecomparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT khalids thecomparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT collinsg thecomparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT prietoalhambrad thecomparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT alim comparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT khalids comparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT collinsg comparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy AT prietoalhambrad comparativeperformanceoflogisticregressionandrandomforestinpropensityscoremethodsasimulationstudy |