The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of static resting splints in early RA. METHODS: A multicentre, randomized, trial was conducted. Patients (n = 120) received either static resting splints [positioned with the wrist in neutral, MCP joint (MCPJ) and IP joint (IPJ) in a maximum of 60 degrees and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adams, J, Burridge, J, Mullee, M, Hammond, A, Cooper, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1826267086222000128
author Adams, J
Burridge, J
Mullee, M
Hammond, A
Cooper, C
author_facet Adams, J
Burridge, J
Mullee, M
Hammond, A
Cooper, C
author_sort Adams, J
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of static resting splints in early RA. METHODS: A multicentre, randomized, trial was conducted. Patients (n = 120) received either static resting splints [positioned with the wrist in neutral, MCP joint (MCPJ) and IP joint (IPJ) in a maximum of 60 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion, respectively] plus standardized occupational therapy or standardized occupational therapy alone. Change in grip strength (Ns), structural impairment (MCPJ ulnar deviation), applied dexterity (Button Board), self-report hand ability [Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)], hand pain and morning hand stiffness were assessed at 0 and 12 months. RESULTS: Data for 56 (97%) splinted and 60 (97%) control group patients were analysed. Splint wear adherence was moderate; 24.5% 'never wore' the splints. The adjusted mean difference between groups for handgrip was -14.2 Ns (P = 0.342; 95% CI -43.7, 5.4); MCPJ ulnar deviation -1.1 degrees (P = 0.657; 95% CI = -6.2, 3.9); dexterity 0.1 s (P = 0.975; 95% CI = -6.6, 6.8) and self-report ability -3.0 on the MHQ score (P = 0.426; 95% CI -10.5, 4.5). Pain scores were unchanged in either group (P = 0.15). The occurrence of morning hand stiffness was reduced in a small group of splinted patients (P = 0.021), but the duration shortened in control patients (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the two interventions on grip strength, deformity, hand function and pain. The data favoured the control group and this study suggests that resting splints should not be used as a routine treatment of patients with early RA.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:48:48Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:36dcbabc-f5db-4876-b44c-3ab0fe77ab80
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:48:48Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:36dcbabc-f5db-4876-b44c-3ab0fe77ab802022-03-26T13:40:29ZThe clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:36dcbabc-f5db-4876-b44c-3ab0fe77ab80EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Adams, JBurridge, JMullee, MHammond, ACooper, COBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of static resting splints in early RA. METHODS: A multicentre, randomized, trial was conducted. Patients (n = 120) received either static resting splints [positioned with the wrist in neutral, MCP joint (MCPJ) and IP joint (IPJ) in a maximum of 60 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion, respectively] plus standardized occupational therapy or standardized occupational therapy alone. Change in grip strength (Ns), structural impairment (MCPJ ulnar deviation), applied dexterity (Button Board), self-report hand ability [Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ)], hand pain and morning hand stiffness were assessed at 0 and 12 months. RESULTS: Data for 56 (97%) splinted and 60 (97%) control group patients were analysed. Splint wear adherence was moderate; 24.5% 'never wore' the splints. The adjusted mean difference between groups for handgrip was -14.2 Ns (P = 0.342; 95% CI -43.7, 5.4); MCPJ ulnar deviation -1.1 degrees (P = 0.657; 95% CI = -6.2, 3.9); dexterity 0.1 s (P = 0.975; 95% CI = -6.6, 6.8) and self-report ability -3.0 on the MHQ score (P = 0.426; 95% CI -10.5, 4.5). Pain scores were unchanged in either group (P = 0.15). The occurrence of morning hand stiffness was reduced in a small group of splinted patients (P = 0.021), but the duration shortened in control patients (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the two interventions on grip strength, deformity, hand function and pain. The data favoured the control group and this study suggests that resting splints should not be used as a routine treatment of patients with early RA.
spellingShingle Adams, J
Burridge, J
Mullee, M
Hammond, A
Cooper, C
The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
title The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_full The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_short The clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
title_sort clinical effectiveness of static resting splints in early rheumatoid arthritis a randomized controlled trial
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsj theclinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT burridgej theclinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mulleem theclinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hammonda theclinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cooperc theclinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT adamsj clinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT burridgej clinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mulleem clinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hammonda clinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cooperc clinicaleffectivenessofstaticrestingsplintsinearlyrheumatoidarthritisarandomizedcontrolledtrial