Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: An unexpected finding from the phase III parotid sparing radiotherapy trial, PARSPORT (ISRCTN48243537, CRUK/03/005), was a statistically significant increase in acute fatigue for those patients who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to standard conventiona...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gulliford, S, Miah, AB, Brennan, S, McQuaid, D, Clark, C, Partridge, M, Harrington, K, Morden, J, Hall, E, Nutting, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1826267179040899072
author Gulliford, S
Miah, AB
Brennan, S
McQuaid, D
Clark, C
Partridge, M
Harrington, K
Morden, J
Hall, E
Nutting, C
author_facet Gulliford, S
Miah, AB
Brennan, S
McQuaid, D
Clark, C
Partridge, M
Harrington, K
Morden, J
Hall, E
Nutting, C
author_sort Gulliford, S
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: An unexpected finding from the phase III parotid sparing radiotherapy trial, PARSPORT (ISRCTN48243537, CRUK/03/005), was a statistically significant increase in acute fatigue for those patients who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to standard conventional radiotherapy (CRT). One possible explanation was the difference in dose to central nervous system (CNS) structures due to differing beam portals. Using data from the trial, a dosimetric analysis of individual CNS structures was performed. METHOD: Dosimetric and toxicity data were available for 67 patients (27 CRT, 40 IMRT). Retrospective delineation of the posterior fossa, brainstem, cerebellum, pituitary gland, pineal gland, hypothalamus, hippocampus and basal ganglia was performed. Dosimetry was reviewed using summary statistics and dose-volume atlases. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in maximum and mean doses to each structure was observed for patients who received IMRT compared to those who received CRT. Both maximum and mean doses were significantly higher for the posterior fossa, brainstem and cerebellum for the 42 patients who reported acute fatigue of Grade 2 or higher (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the 25 who did not. Dose-volume atlases of the same structures indicated that regions representing larger volumes and higher doses to each structure were consistent with a higher incidence of acute fatigue. There was no association between the dose distribution and acute fatigue for the other structures tested. CONCLUSIONS: The excess fatigue reported in the IMRT arm of the trial may, at least in part, be attributed to the dose distribution to the posterior fossa, cerebellum and brainstem. Future studies that modify dose delivery to these structures may allow us to test the hypothesis that radiation-induced fatigue is avoidable.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:50:14Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:374d34a8-ace0-4ec0-b17a-27f531faa6aa
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:50:14Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:374d34a8-ace0-4ec0-b17a-27f531faa6aa2022-03-26T13:43:20ZDosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:374d34a8-ace0-4ec0-b17a-27f531faa6aaEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Gulliford, SMiah, ABBrennan, SMcQuaid, DClark, CPartridge, MHarrington, KMorden, JHall, ENutting, CBACKGROUND: An unexpected finding from the phase III parotid sparing radiotherapy trial, PARSPORT (ISRCTN48243537, CRUK/03/005), was a statistically significant increase in acute fatigue for those patients who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to standard conventional radiotherapy (CRT). One possible explanation was the difference in dose to central nervous system (CNS) structures due to differing beam portals. Using data from the trial, a dosimetric analysis of individual CNS structures was performed. METHOD: Dosimetric and toxicity data were available for 67 patients (27 CRT, 40 IMRT). Retrospective delineation of the posterior fossa, brainstem, cerebellum, pituitary gland, pineal gland, hypothalamus, hippocampus and basal ganglia was performed. Dosimetry was reviewed using summary statistics and dose-volume atlases. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in maximum and mean doses to each structure was observed for patients who received IMRT compared to those who received CRT. Both maximum and mean doses were significantly higher for the posterior fossa, brainstem and cerebellum for the 42 patients who reported acute fatigue of Grade 2 or higher (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the 25 who did not. Dose-volume atlases of the same structures indicated that regions representing larger volumes and higher doses to each structure were consistent with a higher incidence of acute fatigue. There was no association between the dose distribution and acute fatigue for the other structures tested. CONCLUSIONS: The excess fatigue reported in the IMRT arm of the trial may, at least in part, be attributed to the dose distribution to the posterior fossa, cerebellum and brainstem. Future studies that modify dose delivery to these structures may allow us to test the hypothesis that radiation-induced fatigue is avoidable.
spellingShingle Gulliford, S
Miah, AB
Brennan, S
McQuaid, D
Clark, C
Partridge, M
Harrington, K
Morden, J
Hall, E
Nutting, C
Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.
title Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.
title_full Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.
title_fullStr Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.
title_short Dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy: an analysis from the PARSPORT Phase III trial.
title_sort dosimetric explanations of fatigue in head and neck radiotherapy an analysis from the parsport phase iii trial
work_keys_str_mv AT gullifords dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT miahab dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT brennans dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT mcquaidd dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT clarkc dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT partridgem dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT harringtonk dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT mordenj dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT halle dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial
AT nuttingc dosimetricexplanationsoffatigueinheadandneckradiotherapyananalysisfromtheparsportphaseiiitrial