The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of outcome reporting bias-the selection for publication of a subset of the original recorded outcome variables on the basis of the results-and its impact on Cochrane reviews. DESIGN: A nine point classification system for missing outcome data in randomised trials...
Main Authors: | Kirkham, J, Dwan, K, Altman, D, Gamble, C, Dodd, S, Smyth, R, Williamson, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2010
|
Similar Items
-
Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
by: Kirkham, J, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists.
by: Smyth, R, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: Interviews with trialists
by: Smyth, R, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
by: Saini, P, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
by: Dwan, K, et al.
Published: (2014)