The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.

INTRODUCTION: It is increasingly important for surgeons to monitor the outcome of their practice for the purpose of audit. The main difficulty has been the lack of appropriate methods of assessing outcome. Outcome has traditionally been assessed by clinical means which can be inaccurate, irreproduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olley, L, Carr, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2008
_version_ 1797063032222777344
author Olley, L
Carr, A
author_facet Olley, L
Carr, A
author_sort Olley, L
collection OXFORD
description INTRODUCTION: It is increasingly important for surgeons to monitor the outcome of their practice for the purpose of audit. The main difficulty has been the lack of appropriate methods of assessing outcome. Outcome has traditionally been assessed by clinical means which can be inaccurate, irreproducible and subject to surgeon bias. In addition, the perspective of the patient and surgeon may differ with respect to outcome and interest has grown in patient-based scoring systems. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is one such patient-based scoring system. The main aim of this study was to assess whether a patient-based questionnaire, in this case the OSS, could be effectively used to audit outcome from shoulder surgery. A secondary aim was to assess the value of gathering outcome information by post. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients (14 male; median age 59 years; age range, 43-73 years) who had completed a pre-operative OSS questionnaire and had undergone rotator cuff repair were included in the study. Participants were assessed postoperatively at regular intervals using the OSS at hospital visits and by postal questionnaire. RESULTS: The completion level for the OSS was 97% and the response rate to the postal questionnaire was 96%. At 3 months' post-surgery, 21 of 24 patients had improved; at final review (16-37 months), 23 patients had improved following surgery. The OSS was observed to be a robust tool for the quantitative assessment and tracking of patient outcomes after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the value of using a postal questionnaire to follow-up patients after surgery and demonstrates the successful use of a patient-based questionnaire to audit the outcome from shoulder surgery.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:54:03Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:38923bbd-6918-4b86-b7f5-2948f4cf214c
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:54:03Z
publishDate 2008
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:38923bbd-6918-4b86-b7f5-2948f4cf214c2022-03-26T13:50:47ZThe use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:38923bbd-6918-4b86-b7f5-2948f4cf214cEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2008Olley, LCarr, A INTRODUCTION: It is increasingly important for surgeons to monitor the outcome of their practice for the purpose of audit. The main difficulty has been the lack of appropriate methods of assessing outcome. Outcome has traditionally been assessed by clinical means which can be inaccurate, irreproducible and subject to surgeon bias. In addition, the perspective of the patient and surgeon may differ with respect to outcome and interest has grown in patient-based scoring systems. The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is one such patient-based scoring system. The main aim of this study was to assess whether a patient-based questionnaire, in this case the OSS, could be effectively used to audit outcome from shoulder surgery. A secondary aim was to assess the value of gathering outcome information by post. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 24 patients (14 male; median age 59 years; age range, 43-73 years) who had completed a pre-operative OSS questionnaire and had undergone rotator cuff repair were included in the study. Participants were assessed postoperatively at regular intervals using the OSS at hospital visits and by postal questionnaire. RESULTS: The completion level for the OSS was 97% and the response rate to the postal questionnaire was 96%. At 3 months' post-surgery, 21 of 24 patients had improved; at final review (16-37 months), 23 patients had improved following surgery. The OSS was observed to be a robust tool for the quantitative assessment and tracking of patient outcomes after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the value of using a postal questionnaire to follow-up patients after surgery and demonstrates the successful use of a patient-based questionnaire to audit the outcome from shoulder surgery.
spellingShingle Olley, L
Carr, A
The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.
title The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.
title_full The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.
title_fullStr The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.
title_full_unstemmed The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.
title_short The use of a patient-based questionnaire (the Oxford Shoulder Score) to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair.
title_sort use of a patient based questionnaire the oxford shoulder score to assess outcome after rotator cuff repair
work_keys_str_mv AT olleyl theuseofapatientbasedquestionnairetheoxfordshoulderscoretoassessoutcomeafterrotatorcuffrepair
AT carra theuseofapatientbasedquestionnairetheoxfordshoulderscoretoassessoutcomeafterrotatorcuffrepair
AT olleyl useofapatientbasedquestionnairetheoxfordshoulderscoretoassessoutcomeafterrotatorcuffrepair
AT carra useofapatientbasedquestionnairetheoxfordshoulderscoretoassessoutcomeafterrotatorcuffrepair