Analyticity, balance and non-admissibility of Cut in Stoic logic
This paper shows that, for the Hertz–Gentzen Systems of 1933 (without Thinning), extended by a classical rule T1 (from the Stoics) and using certain axioms (also from the Stoics), all derivations are analytic: every cut formula occurs as a subformula in the cut’s conclusion. Since the Stoic cut rule...
Main Authors: | Bobzien, S, Dyckhoff, R |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Verlag
2018
|
Similar Items
-
Stoic logic and multiple generality
by: Bobzien, S, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Stoic sequent logic and proof theory
by: Bobzien, S
Published: (2019) -
Demonstration and the indemonstrability of the Stoic indemonstrables
by: Bobzien, S
Published: (2020) -
Relevant Interpretation of Stoic Logic
by: Amin Shahverdi, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
Pseudo-conditionals and causal assertibles in Stoic logic
by: Miguel López-Astorga
Published: (2016-09-01)