Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies

The emissions reduction pledges made by individual countries through the 2015 Paris Agreement represent the current global commitment to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the face of the enduring climate crisis. Natural lands carbon sequestration and storage are critical for successful pathways t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wedding, LM, Moritsch, M, Verutes, G, Arkema, K, Hartge, E, Reiblich, J, Douglass, J, Taylor, S, Strong, AL
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
_version_ 1797063218606112768
author Wedding, LM
Moritsch, M
Verutes, G
Arkema, K
Hartge, E
Reiblich, J
Douglass, J
Taylor, S
Strong, AL
author_facet Wedding, LM
Moritsch, M
Verutes, G
Arkema, K
Hartge, E
Reiblich, J
Douglass, J
Taylor, S
Strong, AL
author_sort Wedding, LM
collection OXFORD
description The emissions reduction pledges made by individual countries through the 2015 Paris Agreement represent the current global commitment to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the face of the enduring climate crisis. Natural lands carbon sequestration and storage are critical for successful pathways to global decarbonization (i.e., as a negative emissions technology). Coastal vegetated habitats maintain carbon sequestration rates exceeding forest sequestration rates on a per unit area basis by nearly two orders of magnitude. These blue carbon habitats and their associated carbon sequestration benefits are vulnerable to losses from land-use change and sea-level rise. Incorporation of blue carbon habitats in climate change policy is one strategy for both maintaining these habitats and conserving significant carbon sequestration capabilities. Previous policy assessments have found the potential for incorporation of coastal carbon sequestration in national-level policies, yet there has – to date – been little inclusion of blue carbon in the national-scale implementation of Paris commitments. Recently, sub-national jurisdictions have gained attention as models for pathways to decarbonization. However, few previous studies have examined sub-national level policy opportunities for operationalizing blue carbon into climate decision-making. California is uniquely poised to integrate benefits from blue carbon into its coastal planning and management and its suite of climate mitigation policies. Here, we evaluated legal authorities and policy contexts addressing sequestration specifically from blue carbon habitats. We synthesized the progressive action in California's approaches to mitigate carbon emissions including statutory, regulatory, and non-regulatory opportunities to incorporate blue carbon ecosystem service information into state- and local-level management decisions. To illustrate how actionable blue carbon information can be produced for use in decision-making, we conducted a spatial analysis of blue carbon sequestration in several locations in California across multiple agencies and management contexts. We found that the average market values of carbon sequestration services in 2100 ranged from $7,730 to $44,000 per hectare and that the social cost of carbon sequestration value was 1.3 to 2.7 times the market value. We also demonstrated that restoration of small areas with high sequestration rates can be comparable to the sequestration of existing marshes. Our results illustrate how accessible information about carbon sequestration in coastal habitats can be directly incorporated into existing policy frameworks at the sub-national scale. The incorporation of blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies can serve as a model for the development of future policy approaches for negative emissions technologies, with consequences for the success of the Paris Agreement and science-based decarbonization by mid-century.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:56:40Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:397e89eb-b69c-43fe-afa3-297ac4442b7b
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:56:40Z
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:397e89eb-b69c-43fe-afa3-297ac4442b7b2022-03-26T13:55:54ZIncorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policiesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:397e89eb-b69c-43fe-afa3-297ac4442b7bEnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2021Wedding, LMMoritsch, MVerutes, GArkema, KHartge, EReiblich, JDouglass, JTaylor, SStrong, ALThe emissions reduction pledges made by individual countries through the 2015 Paris Agreement represent the current global commitment to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the face of the enduring climate crisis. Natural lands carbon sequestration and storage are critical for successful pathways to global decarbonization (i.e., as a negative emissions technology). Coastal vegetated habitats maintain carbon sequestration rates exceeding forest sequestration rates on a per unit area basis by nearly two orders of magnitude. These blue carbon habitats and their associated carbon sequestration benefits are vulnerable to losses from land-use change and sea-level rise. Incorporation of blue carbon habitats in climate change policy is one strategy for both maintaining these habitats and conserving significant carbon sequestration capabilities. Previous policy assessments have found the potential for incorporation of coastal carbon sequestration in national-level policies, yet there has – to date – been little inclusion of blue carbon in the national-scale implementation of Paris commitments. Recently, sub-national jurisdictions have gained attention as models for pathways to decarbonization. However, few previous studies have examined sub-national level policy opportunities for operationalizing blue carbon into climate decision-making. California is uniquely poised to integrate benefits from blue carbon into its coastal planning and management and its suite of climate mitigation policies. Here, we evaluated legal authorities and policy contexts addressing sequestration specifically from blue carbon habitats. We synthesized the progressive action in California's approaches to mitigate carbon emissions including statutory, regulatory, and non-regulatory opportunities to incorporate blue carbon ecosystem service information into state- and local-level management decisions. To illustrate how actionable blue carbon information can be produced for use in decision-making, we conducted a spatial analysis of blue carbon sequestration in several locations in California across multiple agencies and management contexts. We found that the average market values of carbon sequestration services in 2100 ranged from $7,730 to $44,000 per hectare and that the social cost of carbon sequestration value was 1.3 to 2.7 times the market value. We also demonstrated that restoration of small areas with high sequestration rates can be comparable to the sequestration of existing marshes. Our results illustrate how accessible information about carbon sequestration in coastal habitats can be directly incorporated into existing policy frameworks at the sub-national scale. The incorporation of blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies can serve as a model for the development of future policy approaches for negative emissions technologies, with consequences for the success of the Paris Agreement and science-based decarbonization by mid-century.
spellingShingle Wedding, LM
Moritsch, M
Verutes, G
Arkema, K
Hartge, E
Reiblich, J
Douglass, J
Taylor, S
Strong, AL
Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies
title Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies
title_full Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies
title_fullStr Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies
title_short Incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub-national climate policies
title_sort incorporating blue carbon sequestration benefits into sub national climate policies
work_keys_str_mv AT weddinglm incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT moritschm incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT verutesg incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT arkemak incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT hartgee incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT reiblichj incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT douglassj incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT taylors incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies
AT strongal incorporatingbluecarbonsequestrationbenefitsintosubnationalclimatepolicies