The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.
Previously validated for hallux valgus surgery, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is here evaluated for use with different regions of the foot and ankle. The study recruited 671 consecutive patients (87.8% of those eligible), mean age 52.8 years, 64% female, who completed the MOXFQ an...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| _version_ | 1797063346360418304 |
|---|---|
| author | Dawson, J Boller, I Doll, H Lavis, G Sharp, R Cooke, P Jenkinson, C |
| author_facet | Dawson, J Boller, I Doll, H Lavis, G Sharp, R Cooke, P Jenkinson, C |
| author_sort | Dawson, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Previously validated for hallux valgus surgery, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is here evaluated for use with different regions of the foot and ankle. The study recruited 671 consecutive patients (87.8% of those eligible), mean age 52.8 years, 64% female, who completed the MOXFQ and SF-36 general health survey before foot or ankle surgery. Surgeons completed the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scales and indicated that the patients' main regions for surgery were: Hallux 210 (31.3%), Lesser toes 119 (17.7%), Mid foot 22 (3.3%), Ankle/hind foot 311 (46.3%), Multiple/whole foot 9 (1.3%). Individual MOXFQ items were assessed in terms of response rate and floor/ceiling effects, with the validity of the three MOXFQ scales (Walking/standing, Pain, and Social interaction) being assessed in terms of item-total correlations, internal and test-retest reliability, and construct validity. MOXFQ item response rates were high (all >98%). Cronbach's alphas of >0.7 confirmed internal consistency of all three scales. Test-retest ICCs were all ≥0.89. Correlations of >0.4 obtained with related SF-36 and AOFAS scales supported a priori hypotheses. Good measurement properties are confirmed for the MOXFQ in the context of baseline assessment of patients receiving surgery for a variety of foot or ankle problems. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:58:31Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3a13c339-4a91-4ac8-9b06-0c6019a62eca |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:58:31Z |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3a13c339-4a91-4ac8-9b06-0c6019a62eca2022-03-26T13:59:25ZThe MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3a13c339-4a91-4ac8-9b06-0c6019a62ecaEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Dawson, JBoller, IDoll, HLavis, GSharp, RCooke, PJenkinson, CPreviously validated for hallux valgus surgery, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) is here evaluated for use with different regions of the foot and ankle. The study recruited 671 consecutive patients (87.8% of those eligible), mean age 52.8 years, 64% female, who completed the MOXFQ and SF-36 general health survey before foot or ankle surgery. Surgeons completed the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scales and indicated that the patients' main regions for surgery were: Hallux 210 (31.3%), Lesser toes 119 (17.7%), Mid foot 22 (3.3%), Ankle/hind foot 311 (46.3%), Multiple/whole foot 9 (1.3%). Individual MOXFQ items were assessed in terms of response rate and floor/ceiling effects, with the validity of the three MOXFQ scales (Walking/standing, Pain, and Social interaction) being assessed in terms of item-total correlations, internal and test-retest reliability, and construct validity. MOXFQ item response rates were high (all >98%). Cronbach's alphas of >0.7 confirmed internal consistency of all three scales. Test-retest ICCs were all ≥0.89. Correlations of >0.4 obtained with related SF-36 and AOFAS scales supported a priori hypotheses. Good measurement properties are confirmed for the MOXFQ in the context of baseline assessment of patients receiving surgery for a variety of foot or ankle problems. |
| spellingShingle | Dawson, J Boller, I Doll, H Lavis, G Sharp, R Cooke, P Jenkinson, C The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. |
| title | The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. |
| title_full | The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. |
| title_fullStr | The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. |
| title_full_unstemmed | The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. |
| title_short | The MOXFQ patient-reported questionnaire: assessment of data quality, reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery. |
| title_sort | moxfq patient reported questionnaire assessment of data quality reliability and validity in relation to foot and ankle surgery |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dawsonj themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT bolleri themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT dollh themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT lavisg themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT sharpr themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT cookep themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT jenkinsonc themoxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT dawsonj moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT bolleri moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT dollh moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT lavisg moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT sharpr moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT cookep moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery AT jenkinsonc moxfqpatientreportedquestionnaireassessmentofdataqualityreliabilityandvalidityinrelationtofootandanklesurgery |