Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity

The assumption that differences in species’ traits reflect their different niches has long influenced how ecologists infer processes from assemblage patterns. For instance, many assess the importance of environmental filtering versus classical limiting-similarity competition in driving biological in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wong, MKL, Lee, RH, Leong, C-M, Lewis, OT, Guenard, B
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2022
_version_ 1797107367041564672
author Wong, MKL
Lee, RH
Leong, C-M
Lewis, OT
Guenard, B
author_facet Wong, MKL
Lee, RH
Leong, C-M
Lewis, OT
Guenard, B
author_sort Wong, MKL
collection OXFORD
description The assumption that differences in species’ traits reflect their different niches has long influenced how ecologists infer processes from assemblage patterns. For instance, many assess the importance of environmental filtering versus classical limiting-similarity competition in driving biological invasions by examining whether invaders’ traits are similar or dissimilar to those of residents, respectively. However, mounting evidence suggests that hierarchical differences between species’ trait values can distinguish their competitive abilities (e.g., for the same resource) instead of their niches. Whether such trait-mediated hierarchical competition explains invasions and structures assemblages is less explored. We integrate morphological, dietary, physiological and behavioural trait analyses to test whether environmental filtering, limiting-similarity competition, or hierarchical competition explain invasions by fire ants on ant assemblages. We detect both competition mechanisms; invasion success is not only explained by limiting similarity in body size and thermal tolerance (presumably allowing the invader to exploit different niches from residents), but also by the invader’s superior position in trait hierarchies reflecting competition for common trophic resources. We find that the two mechanisms generate complex assemblage-level functional diversity patterns – overdispersion in some traits, clustering in others – suggesting their effects are likely missed by analyses restricted to a few traits and composite trait diversity measures.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:15:00Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3a31bd7f-eb0c-4c43-bdb3-ea13e9a51816
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:15:00Z
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3a31bd7f-eb0c-4c43-bdb3-ea13e9a518162022-08-08T09:44:23ZTrait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3a31bd7f-eb0c-4c43-bdb3-ea13e9a51816EnglishSymplectic ElementsThe Royal Society2022Wong, MKLLee, RHLeong, C-MLewis, OTGuenard, BThe assumption that differences in species’ traits reflect their different niches has long influenced how ecologists infer processes from assemblage patterns. For instance, many assess the importance of environmental filtering versus classical limiting-similarity competition in driving biological invasions by examining whether invaders’ traits are similar or dissimilar to those of residents, respectively. However, mounting evidence suggests that hierarchical differences between species’ trait values can distinguish their competitive abilities (e.g., for the same resource) instead of their niches. Whether such trait-mediated hierarchical competition explains invasions and structures assemblages is less explored. We integrate morphological, dietary, physiological and behavioural trait analyses to test whether environmental filtering, limiting-similarity competition, or hierarchical competition explain invasions by fire ants on ant assemblages. We detect both competition mechanisms; invasion success is not only explained by limiting similarity in body size and thermal tolerance (presumably allowing the invader to exploit different niches from residents), but also by the invader’s superior position in trait hierarchies reflecting competition for common trophic resources. We find that the two mechanisms generate complex assemblage-level functional diversity patterns – overdispersion in some traits, clustering in others – suggesting their effects are likely missed by analyses restricted to a few traits and composite trait diversity measures.
spellingShingle Wong, MKL
Lee, RH
Leong, C-M
Lewis, OT
Guenard, B
Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
title Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
title_full Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
title_fullStr Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
title_full_unstemmed Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
title_short Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
title_sort trait mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity
work_keys_str_mv AT wongmkl traitmediatedcompetitiondrivesanantinvasionandaltersfunctionaldiversity
AT leerh traitmediatedcompetitiondrivesanantinvasionandaltersfunctionaldiversity
AT leongcm traitmediatedcompetitiondrivesanantinvasionandaltersfunctionaldiversity
AT lewisot traitmediatedcompetitiondrivesanantinvasionandaltersfunctionaldiversity
AT guenardb traitmediatedcompetitiondrivesanantinvasionandaltersfunctionaldiversity