Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government
Decentralized public organizations have many advantages, but can be inefficient due to suboptimal organizational size and duplication of activities. Selective inter-organizational collaboration may produce economies of scale without undoing the benefits of decentralization, assuming that co-ordinati...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Routledge
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797063372430114816 |
|---|---|
| author | Dixon, R Elston, T |
| author_facet | Dixon, R Elston, T |
| author_sort | Dixon, R |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Decentralized public organizations have many advantages, but can be inefficient due to suboptimal organizational size and duplication of activities. Selective inter-organizational collaboration may produce economies of scale without undoing the benefits of decentralization, assuming that co-ordination and re-organization costs are low. The authors tested this popular reform logic using data from all English councils, focusing on shared administration and tax collection. There were no significant benefits from either kind of collaboration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:58:53Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3a351a98-9851-40bc-99b9-00b7af62254a |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T20:58:53Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Routledge |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3a351a98-9851-40bc-99b9-00b7af62254a2022-03-26T14:00:06ZShould councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local governmentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3a351a98-9851-40bc-99b9-00b7af62254aEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordRoutledge2019Dixon, RElston, TDecentralized public organizations have many advantages, but can be inefficient due to suboptimal organizational size and duplication of activities. Selective inter-organizational collaboration may produce economies of scale without undoing the benefits of decentralization, assuming that co-ordination and re-organization costs are low. The authors tested this popular reform logic using data from all English councils, focusing on shared administration and tax collection. There were no significant benefits from either kind of collaboration. |
| spellingShingle | Dixon, R Elston, T Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government |
| title | Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government |
| title_full | Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government |
| title_fullStr | Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government |
| title_full_unstemmed | Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government |
| title_short | Should councils collaborate? Evaluating shared administration and tax services in English local government |
| title_sort | should councils collaborate evaluating shared administration and tax services in english local government |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dixonr shouldcouncilscollaborateevaluatingsharedadministrationandtaxservicesinenglishlocalgovernment AT elstont shouldcouncilscollaborateevaluatingsharedadministrationandtaxservicesinenglishlocalgovernment |