A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.

We compared demographic and clinical features, including outcome defined by a failure time analysis of disability, in 143 patients with a family history of multiple sclerosis (familial MS) compared with 956 patients without such a history (sporadic MS). Patients with familial MS did not differ from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weinshenker, BG, Bulman, D, Carriere, W, Baskerville, J, Ebers, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 1990
_version_ 1797063376750247936
author Weinshenker, BG
Bulman, D
Carriere, W
Baskerville, J
Ebers, G
author_facet Weinshenker, BG
Bulman, D
Carriere, W
Baskerville, J
Ebers, G
author_sort Weinshenker, BG
collection OXFORD
description We compared demographic and clinical features, including outcome defined by a failure time analysis of disability, in 143 patients with a family history of multiple sclerosis (familial MS) compared with 956 patients without such a history (sporadic MS). Patients with familial MS did not differ from those with sporadic MS even when patients with 1st-degree relatives or multiple relatives with MS were considered separately. An intraclass correlation analysis of 13 pairs of affected 1st-degree relatives, both members of which were followed in our clinic, failed to reveal heterogeneity among different families. We were unable to find any support for differences between familial and sporadic MS.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T20:58:57Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3a3a2c5b-7e3a-4ce0-988c-f024e2cd928a
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T20:58:57Z
publishDate 1990
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3a3a2c5b-7e3a-4ce0-988c-f024e2cd928a2022-03-26T14:00:21ZA comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3a3a2c5b-7e3a-4ce0-988c-f024e2cd928aEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1990Weinshenker, BGBulman, DCarriere, WBaskerville, JEbers, GWe compared demographic and clinical features, including outcome defined by a failure time analysis of disability, in 143 patients with a family history of multiple sclerosis (familial MS) compared with 956 patients without such a history (sporadic MS). Patients with familial MS did not differ from those with sporadic MS even when patients with 1st-degree relatives or multiple relatives with MS were considered separately. An intraclass correlation analysis of 13 pairs of affected 1st-degree relatives, both members of which were followed in our clinic, failed to reveal heterogeneity among different families. We were unable to find any support for differences between familial and sporadic MS.
spellingShingle Weinshenker, BG
Bulman, D
Carriere, W
Baskerville, J
Ebers, G
A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.
title A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.
title_full A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.
title_fullStr A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.
title_short A comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis.
title_sort comparison of sporadic and familial multiple sclerosis
work_keys_str_mv AT weinshenkerbg acomparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT bulmand acomparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT carrierew acomparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT baskervillej acomparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT ebersg acomparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT weinshenkerbg comparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT bulmand comparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT carrierew comparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT baskervillej comparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis
AT ebersg comparisonofsporadicandfamilialmultiplesclerosis