Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.

The mechanisms underlying segmentation and selection of visual stimuli over time were investigated in patients with posterior parietal damage. In a modified visual search task, a preview of old objects preceded search of a new set for a target while the old items remained. In Experiment 1, control p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olivers, C, Humphreys, G
Formato: Journal article
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2004
_version_ 1826267872454770688
author Olivers, C
Humphreys, G
author_facet Olivers, C
Humphreys, G
author_sort Olivers, C
collection OXFORD
description The mechanisms underlying segmentation and selection of visual stimuli over time were investigated in patients with posterior parietal damage. In a modified visual search task, a preview of old objects preceded search of a new set for a target while the old items remained. In Experiment 1, control participants ignored old and prioritized new items, but patients had severe difficulties finding the target (especially on the contralesional side). In Experiment 2, simplified displays yielded analogous results, ruling out search ease as a crucial factor in poor preview search. In Experiment 3, outlines around distractor groups (to aid segmentation) improved conjunction but not preview search, suggesting a specific deficit in spatiotemporal segmentation. Experiment 4 ruled out spatial disengagement problems as a factor. The data emphasize the role of spatiotemporal segmentation cues in preview search and the parietal lobe in the role of these cues to prioritize search of new stimuli.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:00:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3ad70598-077e-4da5-8c1a-39dae3c1a69d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:00:54Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3ad70598-077e-4da5-8c1a-39dae3c1a69d2022-03-26T14:04:01ZSpatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3ad70598-077e-4da5-8c1a-39dae3c1a69dEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2004Olivers, CHumphreys, GThe mechanisms underlying segmentation and selection of visual stimuli over time were investigated in patients with posterior parietal damage. In a modified visual search task, a preview of old objects preceded search of a new set for a target while the old items remained. In Experiment 1, control participants ignored old and prioritized new items, but patients had severe difficulties finding the target (especially on the contralesional side). In Experiment 2, simplified displays yielded analogous results, ruling out search ease as a crucial factor in poor preview search. In Experiment 3, outlines around distractor groups (to aid segmentation) improved conjunction but not preview search, suggesting a specific deficit in spatiotemporal segmentation. Experiment 4 ruled out spatial disengagement problems as a factor. The data emphasize the role of spatiotemporal segmentation cues in preview search and the parietal lobe in the role of these cues to prioritize search of new stimuli.
spellingShingle Olivers, C
Humphreys, G
Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
title Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
title_full Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
title_fullStr Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
title_full_unstemmed Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
title_short Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.
title_sort spatiotemporal segregation in visual search evidence from parietal lesions
work_keys_str_mv AT oliversc spatiotemporalsegregationinvisualsearchevidencefromparietallesions
AT humphreysg spatiotemporalsegregationinvisualsearchevidencefromparietallesions