Perceptual pluralism

Perceptual systems respond to proximal stimuli by forming mental representations of distal stimuli. A central goal for the philosophy of perception is to characterize the representations delivered by perceptual systems. It may be that all perceptual representations are in some way proprietarily perc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quilty-Dunn, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019
_version_ 1826267950485602304
author Quilty-Dunn, J
author_facet Quilty-Dunn, J
author_sort Quilty-Dunn, J
collection OXFORD
description Perceptual systems respond to proximal stimuli by forming mental representations of distal stimuli. A central goal for the philosophy of perception is to characterize the representations delivered by perceptual systems. It may be that all perceptual representations are in some way proprietarily perceptual and differ from the representational format of thought (Dretske 1981; Carey 2009; Burge 2010; Block ms.). Or it may instead be that perception and cognition always trade in the same code (Prinz 2002; Pylyshyn 2003). This paper rejects both approaches in favor of perceptual pluralism, the thesis that perception delivers a multiplicity of representational formats, some proprietary and some shared with cognition. The argument for perceptual pluralism marshals a wide array of empirical evidence in favor of iconic (i.e., image-like, analog) representations in perception as well as discursive (i.e., language-like, digital) perceptual object representations.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:02:07Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3b3aa8a7-fb38-4c29-9486-293d61243f67
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:02:07Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3b3aa8a7-fb38-4c29-9486-293d61243f672022-03-26T14:06:22ZPerceptual pluralismJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3b3aa8a7-fb38-4c29-9486-293d61243f67EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2019Quilty-Dunn, JPerceptual systems respond to proximal stimuli by forming mental representations of distal stimuli. A central goal for the philosophy of perception is to characterize the representations delivered by perceptual systems. It may be that all perceptual representations are in some way proprietarily perceptual and differ from the representational format of thought (Dretske 1981; Carey 2009; Burge 2010; Block ms.). Or it may instead be that perception and cognition always trade in the same code (Prinz 2002; Pylyshyn 2003). This paper rejects both approaches in favor of perceptual pluralism, the thesis that perception delivers a multiplicity of representational formats, some proprietary and some shared with cognition. The argument for perceptual pluralism marshals a wide array of empirical evidence in favor of iconic (i.e., image-like, analog) representations in perception as well as discursive (i.e., language-like, digital) perceptual object representations.
spellingShingle Quilty-Dunn, J
Perceptual pluralism
title Perceptual pluralism
title_full Perceptual pluralism
title_fullStr Perceptual pluralism
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual pluralism
title_short Perceptual pluralism
title_sort perceptual pluralism
work_keys_str_mv AT quiltydunnj perceptualpluralism