A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update

<h4>Background</h4> <p>Temporal changes in the placebo arm of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been thoroughly investigated, despite the fact that results of RCTs depend on the comparison between arms.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>In this update of o...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Wartolowska, KA, Gerry, S, Feakins, BG, Collins, GS, Cook, J, Judge, A, Carr, AJ
Aineistotyyppi: Journal article
Julkaistu: BioMed Central 2017
_version_ 1826267961493553152
author Wartolowska, KA
Gerry, S
Feakins, BG
Collins, GS
Cook, J
Judge, A
Carr, AJ
author_facet Wartolowska, KA
Gerry, S
Feakins, BG
Collins, GS
Cook, J
Judge, A
Carr, AJ
author_sort Wartolowska, KA
collection OXFORD
description <h4>Background</h4> <p>Temporal changes in the placebo arm of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been thoroughly investigated, despite the fact that results of RCTs depend on the comparison between arms.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>In this update of our earlier systematic review and meta-analysis, we set out to investigate the effect of assessment time and number of visits on the magnitude of change from baseline in the placebo arm of these trials. We used linear mixed-effects models to account for within-trial correlations.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>Across all 47 trials the magnitude of response in the placebo arm did not change with time (β = -0.0070, 95% CI -0.024, 0.010) or visit (β = -0.033, 95% CI -0.082, 0.017) and remained significantly different from baseline for at least 12 months or seven follow-up visits. Change in the placebo arm in trials with subjective outcomes was large (β0 = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53, 0.82) and relatively constant across time (β = -0.0042, 95% CI -0.024, 0.016) and visit (β = -0.029, 95% CI -0.089, 0.031), whereas in trials with objective outcomes the response was smaller (β0 = 0.28, 95% CI 0.11, 0.46) and diminished with time (β = -0.030, 95% CI -0.050, -0.010), but not with visit (β = -0.099, 95% CI -0.30, 0.11). For trials with assessed outcomes, there was no significant effect of time (β = -0.0071, 95% CI -0.026, 0.011) or visit (β = -0.032, 95% CI -0.33, 0.26); however, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies, and high clinical heterogeneity between studies. In trials with pain as an outcome, the improvement was significant (β0 = 0.91, 95% CI 0.75, 1.07), but there was no effect of time (β = -0.013, 95% CI -0.06, 0.03) or visit (β = -0.045, 95% CI -0.16, 0.069), and pain ratings remained significantly different from baseline for 12 months or seven visits.</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>These results are consistent with our previous findings. In trials with subjective outcomes response in the placebo arm remains large and relatively constant for at least a year, which is interesting considering that this is an effect of a single application of an invasive procedure. The lack of effect of time and visit number on subjective outcomes raises further questions regarding whether the observed response is the result of placebo effect or the result of bias.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:02:17Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3b473d98-a35c-4a19-86a9-35c5d2a8a793
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:02:17Z
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3b473d98-a35c-4a19-86a9-35c5d2a8a7932022-03-26T14:06:39ZA meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an updateJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3b473d98-a35c-4a19-86a9-35c5d2a8a793Symplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2017Wartolowska, KAGerry, SFeakins, BGCollins, GSCook, JJudge, ACarr, AJ <h4>Background</h4> <p>Temporal changes in the placebo arm of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been thoroughly investigated, despite the fact that results of RCTs depend on the comparison between arms.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>In this update of our earlier systematic review and meta-analysis, we set out to investigate the effect of assessment time and number of visits on the magnitude of change from baseline in the placebo arm of these trials. We used linear mixed-effects models to account for within-trial correlations.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>Across all 47 trials the magnitude of response in the placebo arm did not change with time (β = -0.0070, 95% CI -0.024, 0.010) or visit (β = -0.033, 95% CI -0.082, 0.017) and remained significantly different from baseline for at least 12 months or seven follow-up visits. Change in the placebo arm in trials with subjective outcomes was large (β0 = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53, 0.82) and relatively constant across time (β = -0.0042, 95% CI -0.024, 0.016) and visit (β = -0.029, 95% CI -0.089, 0.031), whereas in trials with objective outcomes the response was smaller (β0 = 0.28, 95% CI 0.11, 0.46) and diminished with time (β = -0.030, 95% CI -0.050, -0.010), but not with visit (β = -0.099, 95% CI -0.30, 0.11). For trials with assessed outcomes, there was no significant effect of time (β = -0.0071, 95% CI -0.026, 0.011) or visit (β = -0.032, 95% CI -0.33, 0.26); however, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies, and high clinical heterogeneity between studies. In trials with pain as an outcome, the improvement was significant (β0 = 0.91, 95% CI 0.75, 1.07), but there was no effect of time (β = -0.013, 95% CI -0.06, 0.03) or visit (β = -0.045, 95% CI -0.16, 0.069), and pain ratings remained significantly different from baseline for 12 months or seven visits.</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>These results are consistent with our previous findings. In trials with subjective outcomes response in the placebo arm remains large and relatively constant for at least a year, which is interesting considering that this is an effect of a single application of an invasive procedure. The lack of effect of time and visit number on subjective outcomes raises further questions regarding whether the observed response is the result of placebo effect or the result of bias.</p>
spellingShingle Wartolowska, KA
Gerry, S
Feakins, BG
Collins, GS
Cook, J
Judge, A
Carr, AJ
A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update
title A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update
title_full A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update
title_short A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update
title_sort meta analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials an update
work_keys_str_mv AT wartolowskaka ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT gerrys ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT feakinsbg ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT collinsgs ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT cookj ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT judgea ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT carraj ametaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT wartolowskaka metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT gerrys metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT feakinsbg metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT collinsgs metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT cookj metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT judgea metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate
AT carraj metaanalysisoftemporalchangesofresponseintheplaceboarmofsurgicalrandomizedcontrolledtrialsanupdate