Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500

This essay sets the development of Christian thinking about law and clerical office in the wider context of the discussion of office in the later Roman empire. It offers a reassessment of the work of Dionysius Exiguus, a well‐known translator from Greek into Latin of the Acts of the fourth‐ and fift...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leyser, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019
_version_ 1826267975827587072
author Leyser, C
author_facet Leyser, C
author_sort Leyser, C
collection OXFORD
description This essay sets the development of Christian thinking about law and clerical office in the wider context of the discussion of office in the later Roman empire. It offers a reassessment of the work of Dionysius Exiguus, a well‐known translator from Greek into Latin of the Acts of the fourth‐ and fifth‐century church councils, and a compiler of papal decretals. The essay attempts to place Dionysius’ work in its immediate Roman context, in the context of fifth‐century canonical activity, especially in North Africa, and in the more general context of the political culture of office‐holding in the late Roman polity. Central here is the tension between bureaucratic regulation and autocratic room for manoeuvre. Dionysius did not attempt fully to resolve this tension, though he did attempt to contain it.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:02:29Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3b59f69e-86c0-4ea1-ac7a-1ab34a81f99f
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:02:29Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3b59f69e-86c0-4ea1-ac7a-1ab34a81f99f2022-03-26T14:07:05ZLaw, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3b59f69e-86c0-4ea1-ac7a-1ab34a81f99fEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2019Leyser, CThis essay sets the development of Christian thinking about law and clerical office in the wider context of the discussion of office in the later Roman empire. It offers a reassessment of the work of Dionysius Exiguus, a well‐known translator from Greek into Latin of the Acts of the fourth‐ and fifth‐century church councils, and a compiler of papal decretals. The essay attempts to place Dionysius’ work in its immediate Roman context, in the context of fifth‐century canonical activity, especially in North Africa, and in the more general context of the political culture of office‐holding in the late Roman polity. Central here is the tension between bureaucratic regulation and autocratic room for manoeuvre. Dionysius did not attempt fully to resolve this tension, though he did attempt to contain it.
spellingShingle Leyser, C
Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500
title Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500
title_full Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500
title_fullStr Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500
title_full_unstemmed Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500
title_short Law, memory, and priestly office in Rome, c.500
title_sort law memory and priestly office in rome c 500
work_keys_str_mv AT leyserc lawmemoryandpriestlyofficeinromec500