A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

It is widely recommended that any developed—diagnostic or prognostic—prediction model is externally validated in terms of its predictive performance measured by calibration and discrimination. When multiple validations have been performed, a systematic review followed by a formal meta-analysis helps...

Полное описание

Библиографические подробности
Главные авторы:	Debray, T, Damen, J, Riley, R, Snell, K, Reitsma, J, Hooft, L, Collins, G, Moons, K
Формат:	Journal article
Язык:	English
Опубликовано:	SAGE Publications 2018

Схожие документы

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes
по: Riley, R, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
по: Snell, KIE, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
по: Riley, R, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019)

External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
по: Riley, R, и др.
Опубликовано: (2016)

Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome
по: Riley, RD, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria
по: Van Smeden, M, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
по: Debray, TPA, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
по: Debray, TPA, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
по: Levis, B, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
по: van Smeden, M, и др.
Опубликовано: (2016)

Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage?
по: Thomas P A Debray, и др.
Опубликовано: (2013-01-01)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
по: Johanna A. Damen, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019-06-01)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
по: Heus, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
по: Heus, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
по: Heus, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part I – Continuous outcomes
по: Riley, R, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018)

Explicit inclusion of treatment in prognostic modelling was recommended in observational and randomised settings
по: Groenwold, R, и др.
Опубликовано: (2016)

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis
по: Maarten van Smeden, и др.
Опубликовано: (2016-11-01)

Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
по: Riley, RD, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2014)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) : the TRIPOD statement
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) : the TRIPOD statement
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
по: Collins, G, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015)

Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome
по: Riley, RD, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration
по: Moons, K, и др.
Опубликовано: (2019)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2020)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
по: Andaur Navarro, CL, и др.
Опубликовано: (2023)

Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of diagnostic and prognostic modeling studies: guidance on their use.
по: Thomas P A Debray, и др.
Опубликовано: (2015-10-01)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
по: Pauline Heus, и др.
Опубликовано: (2018-07-01)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
по: Dhiman, P, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb
по: Snell, KIE, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)

Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome
по: Whittle, R, и др.
Опубликовано: (2024)

Calculating the power to examine treatment-covariate interactions when planning an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials with a binary outcome
по: Riley, RD, и др.
Опубликовано: (2022)

Continual updating and monitoring of clinical prediction models: time for dynamic prediction systems?
по: Jenkins, DA, и др.
Опубликовано: (2021)