A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes

It is widely recommended that any developed—diagnostic or prognostic—prediction model is externally validated in terms of its predictive performance measured by calibration and discrimination. When multiple validations have been performed, a systematic review followed by a formal meta-analysis helps...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Chi tiết về thư mục
Những tác giả chính:	Debray, T, Damen, J, Riley, R, Snell, K, Reitsma, J, Hooft, L, Collins, G, Moons, K
Định dạng:	Journal article
Ngôn ngữ:	English
Được phát hành:	SAGE Publications 2018

Những quyển sách tương tự

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II ‐ binary and time‐to‐event outcomes
Bằng: Riley, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
Bằng: Snell, KIE, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies
Bằng: Riley, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019)

External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
Bằng: Riley, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2016)

Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome
Bằng: Riley, RD, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria
Bằng: Van Smeden, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
Bằng: Debray, TPA, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
Bằng: Debray, TPA, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
Bằng: Levis, B, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis.
Bằng: van Smeden, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2016)

Individual participant data meta-analysis for a binary outcome: one-stage or two-stage?
Bằng: Thomas P A Debray, et al.
Được phát hành: (2013-01-01)

Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bằng: Johanna A. Damen, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019-06-01)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
Bằng: Heus, P, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018)

Uniformity in measuring adherence to reporting guidelines: the example of TRIPOD for assessing completeness of reporting of prediction model studies
Bằng: Heus, P, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
Bằng: Heus, P, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part I – Continuous outcomes
Bằng: Riley, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018)

Explicit inclusion of treatment in prognostic modelling was recommended in observational and randomised settings
Bằng: Groenwold, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2016)

No rationale for 1 variable per 10 events criterion for binary logistic regression analysis
Bằng: Maarten van Smeden, et al.
Được phát hành: (2016-11-01)

Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
Bằng: Riley, RD, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement.
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2014)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) : the TRIPOD statement
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) : the TRIPOD statement
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement.
Bằng: Collins, G, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015)

Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome
Bằng: Riley, RD, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration
Bằng: Moons, K, et al.
Được phát hành: (2019)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
Bằng: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
Bằng: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
Bằng: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Được phát hành: (2020)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
Bằng: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Được phát hành: (2023)

Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of diagnostic and prognostic modeling studies: guidance on their use.
Bằng: Thomas P A Debray, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015-10-01)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
Bằng: Pauline Heus, et al.
Được phát hành: (2018-07-01)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
Bằng: Dhiman, P, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb
Bằng: Snell, KIE, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)

Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome
Bằng: Whittle, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2024)

Calculating the power to examine treatment-covariate interactions when planning an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials with a binary outcome
Bằng: Riley, RD, et al.
Được phát hành: (2022)

Continual updating and monitoring of clinical prediction models: time for dynamic prediction systems?
Bằng: Jenkins, DA, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021)