Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching

BACKGROUND: Acetylation of lysine residues in histone tails plays an important role in the regulation of gene transcription. Bromdomains are the readers of acetylated histone marks, and, consequently, bromodomain-containing proteins have a variety of chromatin-related functions. Moreover, they are i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philpott, M, Rogers, C, Yapp, C, Wells, C, Lambert, J, Strain-Damerell, C, Burgess-Brown, N, Gingras, A, Knapp, S, Müller, S
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2014
_version_ 1797063927939465216
author Philpott, M
Rogers, C
Yapp, C
Wells, C
Lambert, J
Strain-Damerell, C
Burgess-Brown, N
Gingras, A
Knapp, S
Müller, S
author_facet Philpott, M
Rogers, C
Yapp, C
Wells, C
Lambert, J
Strain-Damerell, C
Burgess-Brown, N
Gingras, A
Knapp, S
Müller, S
author_sort Philpott, M
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Acetylation of lysine residues in histone tails plays an important role in the regulation of gene transcription. Bromdomains are the readers of acetylated histone marks, and, consequently, bromodomain-containing proteins have a variety of chromatin-related functions. Moreover, they are increasingly being recognised as important mediators of a wide range of diseases. The first potent and selective bromodomain inhibitors are beginning to be described, but the diverse or unknown functions of bromodomain-containing proteins present challenges to systematically demonstrating cellular efficacy and selectivity for these inhibitors. Here we assess the viability of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays as a target agnostic method for the direct visualisation of an on-target effect of bromodomain inhibitors in living cells. RESULTS: Mutation of a conserved asparagine crucial for binding to acetylated lysines in the bromodomains of BRD3, BRD4 and TRIM24 all resulted in reduction of FRAP recovery times, indicating loss of or significantly reduced binding to acetylated chromatin, as did the addition of known inhibitors. Significant differences between wild type and bromodomain mutants for ATAD2, BAZ2A, BRD1, BRD7, GCN5L2, SMARCA2 and ZMYND11 required the addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) to amplify the binding contribution of the bromodomain. Under these conditions, known inhibitors decreased FRAP recovery times back to mutant control levels. Mutation of the bromodomain did not alter FRAP recovery times for full-length CREBBP, even in the presence of SAHA, indicating that other domains are primarily responsible for anchoring CREBBP to chromatin. However, FRAP assays with multimerised CREBBP bromodomains resulted in a good assay to assess the efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors to this target. The bromodomain and extraterminal protein inhibitor PFI-1 was inactive against other bromodomain targets, demonstrating the specificity of the method. CONCLUSIONS: Viable FRAP assays were established for 11 representative bromodomain-containing proteins that broadly cover the bromodomain phylogenetic tree. Addition of SAHA can overcome weak binding to chromatin, and the use of tandem bromodomain constructs can eliminate masking effects of other chromatin binding domains. Together, these results demonstrate that FRAP assays offer a potentially pan-bromodomain method for generating cell-based assays, allowing the testing of compounds with respect to cell permeability, on-target efficacy and selectivity.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:06:59Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3cce4511-9b4a-45ba-bf65-5f692e816524
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:06:59Z
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3cce4511-9b4a-45ba-bf65-5f692e8165242022-03-26T14:15:48ZAssessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleachingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3cce4511-9b4a-45ba-bf65-5f692e816524EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBioMed Central2014Philpott, MRogers, CYapp, CWells, CLambert, JStrain-Damerell, CBurgess-Brown, NGingras, AKnapp, SMüller, SBACKGROUND: Acetylation of lysine residues in histone tails plays an important role in the regulation of gene transcription. Bromdomains are the readers of acetylated histone marks, and, consequently, bromodomain-containing proteins have a variety of chromatin-related functions. Moreover, they are increasingly being recognised as important mediators of a wide range of diseases. The first potent and selective bromodomain inhibitors are beginning to be described, but the diverse or unknown functions of bromodomain-containing proteins present challenges to systematically demonstrating cellular efficacy and selectivity for these inhibitors. Here we assess the viability of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays as a target agnostic method for the direct visualisation of an on-target effect of bromodomain inhibitors in living cells. RESULTS: Mutation of a conserved asparagine crucial for binding to acetylated lysines in the bromodomains of BRD3, BRD4 and TRIM24 all resulted in reduction of FRAP recovery times, indicating loss of or significantly reduced binding to acetylated chromatin, as did the addition of known inhibitors. Significant differences between wild type and bromodomain mutants for ATAD2, BAZ2A, BRD1, BRD7, GCN5L2, SMARCA2 and ZMYND11 required the addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) to amplify the binding contribution of the bromodomain. Under these conditions, known inhibitors decreased FRAP recovery times back to mutant control levels. Mutation of the bromodomain did not alter FRAP recovery times for full-length CREBBP, even in the presence of SAHA, indicating that other domains are primarily responsible for anchoring CREBBP to chromatin. However, FRAP assays with multimerised CREBBP bromodomains resulted in a good assay to assess the efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors to this target. The bromodomain and extraterminal protein inhibitor PFI-1 was inactive against other bromodomain targets, demonstrating the specificity of the method. CONCLUSIONS: Viable FRAP assays were established for 11 representative bromodomain-containing proteins that broadly cover the bromodomain phylogenetic tree. Addition of SAHA can overcome weak binding to chromatin, and the use of tandem bromodomain constructs can eliminate masking effects of other chromatin binding domains. Together, these results demonstrate that FRAP assays offer a potentially pan-bromodomain method for generating cell-based assays, allowing the testing of compounds with respect to cell permeability, on-target efficacy and selectivity.
spellingShingle Philpott, M
Rogers, C
Yapp, C
Wells, C
Lambert, J
Strain-Damerell, C
Burgess-Brown, N
Gingras, A
Knapp, S
Müller, S
Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
title Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
title_full Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
title_fullStr Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
title_full_unstemmed Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
title_short Assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
title_sort assessing cellular efficacy of bromodomain inhibitors using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching
work_keys_str_mv AT philpottm assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT rogersc assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT yappc assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT wellsc assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT lambertj assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT straindamerellc assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT burgessbrownn assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT gingrasa assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT knapps assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching
AT mullers assessingcellularefficacyofbromodomaininhibitorsusingfluorescencerecoveryafterphotobleaching