Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques
The most common differential pulse techniques are analyzed and their responses are compared. Depending on whether or not the initial conditions are re-established before the application of each double pulse we distinguish between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques. The nomenclature...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2011
|
| _version_ | 1797063940517134336 |
|---|---|
| author | Molina, A Laborda, E Martinez-Ortiz, F Bradley, D Schiffrin, D Compton, R |
| author_facet | Molina, A Laborda, E Martinez-Ortiz, F Bradley, D Schiffrin, D Compton, R |
| author_sort | Molina, A |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | The most common differential pulse techniques are analyzed and their responses are compared. Depending on whether or not the initial conditions are re-established before the application of each double pulse we distinguish between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques. The nomenclature employed in the literature is clarified to avoid future confusion. The differences and similarities between the double pulse and multipulse responses are studied for electrode processes of any degree of reversibility, analysing the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The effect of the electrode size is also discussed, establishing the conditions under which the voltammograms obtained by different techniques are coincident or not. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:07:09Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3cde2bae-cad1-4fe7-8ea8-e9be9e074aac |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:07:09Z |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3cde2bae-cad1-4fe7-8ea8-e9be9e074aac2022-03-26T14:16:13ZComparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniquesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3cde2bae-cad1-4fe7-8ea8-e9be9e074aacEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2011Molina, ALaborda, EMartinez-Ortiz, FBradley, DSchiffrin, DCompton, RThe most common differential pulse techniques are analyzed and their responses are compared. Depending on whether or not the initial conditions are re-established before the application of each double pulse we distinguish between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques. The nomenclature employed in the literature is clarified to avoid future confusion. The differences and similarities between the double pulse and multipulse responses are studied for electrode processes of any degree of reversibility, analysing the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The effect of the electrode size is also discussed, establishing the conditions under which the voltammograms obtained by different techniques are coincident or not. © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| spellingShingle | Molina, A Laborda, E Martinez-Ortiz, F Bradley, D Schiffrin, D Compton, R Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| title | Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| title_full | Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| title_short | Comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| title_sort | comparison between double pulse and multipulse differential techniques |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT molinaa comparisonbetweendoublepulseandmultipulsedifferentialtechniques AT labordae comparisonbetweendoublepulseandmultipulsedifferentialtechniques AT martinezortizf comparisonbetweendoublepulseandmultipulsedifferentialtechniques AT bradleyd comparisonbetweendoublepulseandmultipulsedifferentialtechniques AT schiffrind comparisonbetweendoublepulseandmultipulsedifferentialtechniques AT comptonr comparisonbetweendoublepulseandmultipulsedifferentialtechniques |