Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering
Scientists and policy‐makers promote 'Nature‐based Solutions' to the interconnected challenges associated with the Anthropocene. Often these involve the strategic use of ecosystem engineers: animals, plants, and microbes with disproportionate ecological agency capable of regional or even p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811140111227682816 |
|---|---|
| author | Lorimer, J |
| author_facet | Lorimer, J |
| author_sort | Lorimer, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Scientists and policy‐makers promote 'Nature‐based Solutions' to the interconnected challenges associated with the Anthropocene. Often these involve the strategic use of ecosystem engineers: animals, plants, and microbes with disproportionate ecological agency capable of regional or even planetary‐scale niche construction. This environmental mode of biopolitics is promoted as biomimicry: restoring, rewilding, or rewetting diverse ecological systems. This paper critically examines the multispecies relations promised by this model through a focus on beaver in Britain over the last 12,000 years. It begins with beaver making Britain hospitable for early settlers and agriculturalists as they returned after the last ice age. It traces the subsequent demise of beaver due to hunting and land use change, and then follows the recent return of beaver as tools for natural flood management and nature recovery. It attends to situations in which these multispecies world‐making projects go awry in the weird ecologies of the Anthropocene. This story of beaver helps situate enthusiasms for proactive ecosystem engineering in deeper time. It highlights the beguiling potential of Nature‐based Solutions while cautioning against tendencies towards anthropocentrism, an apolitical mononaturalism, and an ecomodernist hubris. The paper combines concepts from archaeology, ecology, anthropology, and geography into a new framework for theorising multispecies acts of worlding and weirding. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:16:47Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3d4d07e1-f435-46e4-854a-69ca7b6cbb02 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:16:47Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3d4d07e1-f435-46e4-854a-69ca7b6cbb022024-07-21T19:41:43ZWorlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineeringJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3d4d07e1-f435-46e4-854a-69ca7b6cbb02EnglishJisc Publications RouterWiley2024Lorimer, JScientists and policy‐makers promote 'Nature‐based Solutions' to the interconnected challenges associated with the Anthropocene. Often these involve the strategic use of ecosystem engineers: animals, plants, and microbes with disproportionate ecological agency capable of regional or even planetary‐scale niche construction. This environmental mode of biopolitics is promoted as biomimicry: restoring, rewilding, or rewetting diverse ecological systems. This paper critically examines the multispecies relations promised by this model through a focus on beaver in Britain over the last 12,000 years. It begins with beaver making Britain hospitable for early settlers and agriculturalists as they returned after the last ice age. It traces the subsequent demise of beaver due to hunting and land use change, and then follows the recent return of beaver as tools for natural flood management and nature recovery. It attends to situations in which these multispecies world‐making projects go awry in the weird ecologies of the Anthropocene. This story of beaver helps situate enthusiasms for proactive ecosystem engineering in deeper time. It highlights the beguiling potential of Nature‐based Solutions while cautioning against tendencies towards anthropocentrism, an apolitical mononaturalism, and an ecomodernist hubris. The paper combines concepts from archaeology, ecology, anthropology, and geography into a new framework for theorising multispecies acts of worlding and weirding. |
| spellingShingle | Lorimer, J Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| title | Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| title_full | Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| title_fullStr | Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| title_full_unstemmed | Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| title_short | Worlding and weirding with beaver: A more‐than‐human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| title_sort | worlding and weirding with beaver a more than human political ecology of ecosystem engineering |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lorimerj worldingandweirdingwithbeaveramorethanhumanpoliticalecologyofecosystemengineering |