Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy (vs. standard manual analysis) and precision (scan-rescan reproducibility) of three-dimensional guide-point modeling (GPM) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in mice. METHODS: Six male wildtype C57/Bl6 mice (weight 26.2 +/- 1.1 g) were scanned...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Young, A, Barnes, H, Davison, D, Neubauer, S, Schneider, J
Natura: Journal article
Lingua:English
Pubblicazione: 2009
_version_ 1826268386161590272
author Young, A
Barnes, H
Davison, D
Neubauer, S
Schneider, J
author_facet Young, A
Barnes, H
Davison, D
Neubauer, S
Schneider, J
author_sort Young, A
collection OXFORD
description PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy (vs. standard manual analysis) and precision (scan-rescan reproducibility) of three-dimensional guide-point modeling (GPM) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in mice. METHODS: Six male wildtype C57/Bl6 mice (weight 26.2 +/- 1.1 g) were scanned twice, 3 days apart. Each scan was performed twice, at 0.2 mm/pixel with one average and at 0.1 mm/pixel with two averages. The 24 studies were anonymized and analyzed in blinded fashion using GPM and standard manual slice summation. RESULTS: The average error between GPM and standard analysis was 2.3 +/- 5.8 mg in mass, 1.7 +/- 3.2 microL in end-diastolic volume, 2.3 +/- 3.1 microL in end-systolic volume, -2.7 +/- 4.3% in ejection fraction, -0.6 +/- 3.3 microL in stroke volume, and -0.31 +/- 1.56 ml . min(-1) in cardiac output (mean difference +/- SD of differences, n = 24). The average time taken was 8.0 +/- 2.5 minutes for 3D GPM and 48.5 +/- 8.9 minutes for standard analysis (n = 24). Scan-rescan reproducibility results were similar to the standard analysis. No significant differences were found using linear mixed effects modeling in either accuracy or precision between scan resolutions or analysis method. CONCLUSION: 3D GPM enables fast analysis of mouse LV function, with similar accuracy and reproducibility to standard analysis. An image resolution of 0.2 mm/pixel with one average is adequate for LV function studies.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:08:53Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3d75c783-abea-4422-bd9c-4a4a60db89f5
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:08:53Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3d75c783-abea-4422-bd9c-4a4a60db89f52022-03-26T14:19:26ZFast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3d75c783-abea-4422-bd9c-4a4a60db89f5EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Young, ABarnes, HDavison, DNeubauer, SSchneider, J PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy (vs. standard manual analysis) and precision (scan-rescan reproducibility) of three-dimensional guide-point modeling (GPM) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function in mice. METHODS: Six male wildtype C57/Bl6 mice (weight 26.2 +/- 1.1 g) were scanned twice, 3 days apart. Each scan was performed twice, at 0.2 mm/pixel with one average and at 0.1 mm/pixel with two averages. The 24 studies were anonymized and analyzed in blinded fashion using GPM and standard manual slice summation. RESULTS: The average error between GPM and standard analysis was 2.3 +/- 5.8 mg in mass, 1.7 +/- 3.2 microL in end-diastolic volume, 2.3 +/- 3.1 microL in end-systolic volume, -2.7 +/- 4.3% in ejection fraction, -0.6 +/- 3.3 microL in stroke volume, and -0.31 +/- 1.56 ml . min(-1) in cardiac output (mean difference +/- SD of differences, n = 24). The average time taken was 8.0 +/- 2.5 minutes for 3D GPM and 48.5 +/- 8.9 minutes for standard analysis (n = 24). Scan-rescan reproducibility results were similar to the standard analysis. No significant differences were found using linear mixed effects modeling in either accuracy or precision between scan resolutions or analysis method. CONCLUSION: 3D GPM enables fast analysis of mouse LV function, with similar accuracy and reproducibility to standard analysis. An image resolution of 0.2 mm/pixel with one average is adequate for LV function studies.
spellingShingle Young, A
Barnes, H
Davison, D
Neubauer, S
Schneider, J
Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.
title Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.
title_full Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.
title_fullStr Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.
title_full_unstemmed Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.
title_short Fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three-dimensional guide-point modeling.
title_sort fast left ventricular mass and volume assessment in mice with three dimensional guide point modeling
work_keys_str_mv AT younga fastleftventricularmassandvolumeassessmentinmicewiththreedimensionalguidepointmodeling
AT barnesh fastleftventricularmassandvolumeassessmentinmicewiththreedimensionalguidepointmodeling
AT davisond fastleftventricularmassandvolumeassessmentinmicewiththreedimensionalguidepointmodeling
AT neubauers fastleftventricularmassandvolumeassessmentinmicewiththreedimensionalguidepointmodeling
AT schneiderj fastleftventricularmassandvolumeassessmentinmicewiththreedimensionalguidepointmodeling