Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> Antimalarial clinical efficacy studies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria frequently encounter situations in which molecular genotyping is unable to discriminate between parasitic recurrence, either new infection or recrudescenc...
Main Authors: | Dahal, P, Stepniewska, K, Guerin, P, D’Alessandro, U, Price, R, Simpson, J |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Títulos similares
-
Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial efficacy trials: A comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
por: Dahal, P, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Dealing with indeterminate outcomes in antimalarial drug efficacy trials: a comparison between complete case analysis, multiple imputation and inverse probability weighting
por: Prabin Dahal, et al.
Publicado: (2019-11-01) -
Evaluating antimalarial efficacy in single-armed and comparative drug trials using competing risk survival analysis: a simulation study
por: Dahal, P, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Simulation studies to quantify the impact of competing risk events in a hypothetical scenario of falling antimalarial drug efficacy in single-armed and comparative drug trials
por: Dahal, P, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evaluating antimalarial efficacy in single-armed and comparative drug trials using competing risk survival analysis: a simulation study
por: Prabin Dahal, et al.
Publicado: (2019-05-01)