Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models

Objectives We evaluated the presence and frequency of spin practices and poor reporting standards in studies that developed and/or validated clinical prediction models using supervised machine learning techniques. Study Design and Setting We systematically searched PubMed from 01/2018 to 12/2019 to...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون:	Andaur Navarro, CL, Damen, JAA, Takada, T, Nijman, SWJ, Dhiman, P, Ma, J, Collins, GS, Bajpai, R, Riley, RD, Moons, KGM, Hooft, L
التنسيق:	Journal article
اللغة:	English
منشور في:	Elsevier 2023

مواد مشابهة

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
حسب: Andaur Navarro, CL, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022)

Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
حسب: Andaur Navarro, CL, وآخرون
منشور في: (2021)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
حسب: Andaur Navarro, CL, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
حسب: Andaur Navarro, CL, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review
حسب: Dhiman, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
حسب: Dhiman, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
حسب: Dhiman, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
حسب: Snell, KIE, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
حسب: Levis, B, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
حسب: Dhiman, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2021)

Protocol for a systematic review on the methodological and reporting quality of prediction model studies using machine learning techniques
حسب: Gary S Collins, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020-11-01)

Completeness of reporting of clinical prediction models developed using supervised machine learning: a systematic review
حسب: Constanza L. Andaur Navarro, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022-01-01)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
حسب: Collins, GS, وآخرون
منشور في: (2021)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models in journal and conference abstracts: TRIPOD for abstracts
حسب: Heus, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
حسب: Debray, TPA, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
حسب: Debray, TPA, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
حسب: Ma, J, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
حسب: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
حسب: Nguyen, T-L, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
حسب: Wolff, RF, وآخرون
منشور في: (2019)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
حسب: Paula Dhiman, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022-07-01)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
حسب: Paula Dhiman, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022-04-01)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
حسب: Collins, GS, وآخرون
منشور في: (2024)

COVID-19 prediction models should adhere to methodological and reporting standards
حسب: Collins, GS, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
حسب: Heus, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
حسب: Debray, T, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018)

Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
حسب: Riley, RD, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

Stability of clinical prediction models developed using statistical or machine learning methods
حسب: Riley, RD, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
حسب: Van Calster, B, وآخرون
منشور في: (2021)

Calculating the power of a planned individual participant data meta‐analysis to examine prognostic factor effects for a binary outcome
حسب: Whittle, R, وآخرون
منشور في: (2024)

Clinical prediction models and the multiverse of madness
حسب: Riley, RD, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement
حسب: Pauline Heus, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018-07-01)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
حسب: Gary S Collins, وآخرون
منشور في: (2021-07-01)

Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review
حسب: Dhiman, P, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

Open science practices need substantial improvement in prognostic model studies in oncology using machine learning
حسب: Collins, GS, وآخرون
منشور في: (2023)

The Standard & Poors guide to selecting stocks : finding the winners and weeding out the losers /
حسب: Kaye, Michael, 1968-
منشور في: (2006)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
حسب: Riley, RD, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

Flaws in the development and validation of a covid-19 prediction model
حسب: Collins, GS, وآخرون
منشور في: (2020)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 2): how to undertake an external validation study
حسب: Riley, RD, وآخرون
منشور في: (2024)

Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: the importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance
حسب: Martin, GP, وآخرون
منشور في: (2021)