Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance.
Orienting attention retrospectively to selective contents in working memory (WM) influences performance. A separate line of research has shown that stimulus strength shapes perceptual representations. There is little research on how stimulus strength during encoding shapes WM performance, and how ef...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Journal article |
| 语言: | English |
| 出版: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
| _version_ | 1826268474758922240 |
|---|---|
| author | Wildegger, T Humphreys, G Nobre, A |
| author_facet | Wildegger, T Humphreys, G Nobre, A |
| author_sort | Wildegger, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Orienting attention retrospectively to selective contents in working memory (WM) influences performance. A separate line of research has shown that stimulus strength shapes perceptual representations. There is little research on how stimulus strength during encoding shapes WM performance, and how effects of retrospective orienting might vary with changes in stimulus strength. We explore these questions in three experiments using a continuous-recall WM task. In Experiment 1 we show that benefits of cueing spatial attention retrospectively during WM maintenance (retrocueing) varies according to stimulus contrast during encoding. Retrocueing effects emerge for supraliminal but not sub-threshold stimuli. However, once stimuli are supraliminal, performance is no longer influenced by stimulus contrast. In Experiments 2 and 3 we used a mixture-model approach to examine how different sources of error in WM are affected by contrast and retrocueing. For high-contrast stimuli (Experiment 2), retrocues increased the precision of successfully remembered items. For low-contrast stimuli (Experiment 3), retrocues decreased the probability of mistaking a target with distracters. These results suggest that the processes by which retrospective attentional orienting shape WM performance are dependent on the quality of WM representations, which in turn depends on stimulus strength during encoding. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:10:15Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3de48cfe-747e-45db-b387-ba1cf5d504b1 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:10:15Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3de48cfe-747e-45db-b387-ba1cf5d504b12022-03-26T14:22:12ZRetrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3de48cfe-747e-45db-b387-ba1cf5d504b1EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordPublic Library of Science2016Wildegger, THumphreys, GNobre, AOrienting attention retrospectively to selective contents in working memory (WM) influences performance. A separate line of research has shown that stimulus strength shapes perceptual representations. There is little research on how stimulus strength during encoding shapes WM performance, and how effects of retrospective orienting might vary with changes in stimulus strength. We explore these questions in three experiments using a continuous-recall WM task. In Experiment 1 we show that benefits of cueing spatial attention retrospectively during WM maintenance (retrocueing) varies according to stimulus contrast during encoding. Retrocueing effects emerge for supraliminal but not sub-threshold stimuli. However, once stimuli are supraliminal, performance is no longer influenced by stimulus contrast. In Experiments 2 and 3 we used a mixture-model approach to examine how different sources of error in WM are affected by contrast and retrocueing. For high-contrast stimuli (Experiment 2), retrocues increased the precision of successfully remembered items. For low-contrast stimuli (Experiment 3), retrocues decreased the probability of mistaking a target with distracters. These results suggest that the processes by which retrospective attentional orienting shape WM performance are dependent on the quality of WM representations, which in turn depends on stimulus strength during encoding. |
| spellingShingle | Wildegger, T Humphreys, G Nobre, A Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance. |
| title | Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance. |
| title_full | Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance. |
| title_fullStr | Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance. |
| title_short | Retrospective Attention Interacts with Stimulus Strength to Shape Working Memory Performance. |
| title_sort | retrospective attention interacts with stimulus strength to shape working memory performance |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wildeggert retrospectiveattentioninteractswithstimulusstrengthtoshapeworkingmemoryperformance AT humphreysg retrospectiveattentioninteractswithstimulusstrengthtoshapeworkingmemoryperformance AT nobrea retrospectiveattentioninteractswithstimulusstrengthtoshapeworkingmemoryperformance |