A comparison of statistical approaches for analysing missing longitudinal patient reported outcome data in randomised controlled trials
Missing data are a potential source of bias in the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), but are generally unavoidable in clinical research, particularly in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). For longitudinally collected outcomes, often only a small subset of participants will have...
Main Authors: | Rombach, I, Gray, A, Jenkinson, C, Rivero-Arias, O |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Comparison of statistical approaches for analyzing incomplete longitudinal patient-reported outcome data in randomized controlled trials
by: Rombach, I, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Comparison of statistical approaches for analyzing incomplete longitudinal patient-reported outcome data in randomized controlled trials
by: Rombach I, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
The handling, analysis and reporting of missing data in patient reported outcome measures for randomised controlled trials
by: Rombach, I
Published: (2016) -
Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level
by: Rombach, I, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature
by: Rombach, I, et al.
Published: (2016)