Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios
Recent research has increasingly focussed on whether long-term policies for adaptation to climate change are robust given uncertainties about future climate change, technological advances and alternative socio-economic development pathways. The aim of this study was to examine whether adaptation res...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
| _version_ | 1797064334751301632 |
|---|---|
| author | Jager, J Rounsevell, M Harrison, P Omann, I Dunford, R Kammerlander, M Pataki, G |
| author_facet | Jager, J Rounsevell, M Harrison, P Omann, I Dunford, R Kammerlander, M Pataki, G |
| author_sort | Jager, J |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Recent research has increasingly focussed on whether long-term policies for adaptation to climate change are robust given uncertainties about future climate change, technological advances and alternative socio-economic development pathways. The aim of this study was to examine whether adaptation responses are ‘robust’, by looking at whether they reduce vulnerability to climate and socio-economic changes for a selection of ecosystem services across scenarios and two spatial scales: Europe (EU27 plus Norway and Switzerland) and a case study in Scotland. Outputs of the CLIMSAVE Integrated Assessment Platform (IAP) for multiple land-based sectors were used to test whether clusters of adaptation options referred to as policy archetypes reduced vulnerability to climate and socio-economic change for ecosystem service indicators related to biodiversity, flooding, water exploitation, land use diversity, land use intensity and food provision. The results show that the People-based Adaptation archetype is the most robust. This is because it reduces vulnerability by increasing coping capacity (people learn and build networks) and not only by reducing the impacts of climate and socio-economic change. By allowing comparative levels of vulnerability to be explored across sectors and scenarios, the CLIMSAVE approach provides a flexible tool for decision-makers and other stakeholders to increase understanding of which mixes of adaptation measures are robust responses to climate change. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:12:47Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3ebfbb82-681f-4e66-80ca-b256b8341060 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:12:47Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | Springer Netherlands |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3ebfbb82-681f-4e66-80ca-b256b83410602022-03-26T14:27:27ZAssessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenariosJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3ebfbb82-681f-4e66-80ca-b256b8341060Symplectic Elements at OxfordSpringer Netherlands2014Jager, JRounsevell, MHarrison, POmann, IDunford, RKammerlander, MPataki, GRecent research has increasingly focussed on whether long-term policies for adaptation to climate change are robust given uncertainties about future climate change, technological advances and alternative socio-economic development pathways. The aim of this study was to examine whether adaptation responses are ‘robust’, by looking at whether they reduce vulnerability to climate and socio-economic changes for a selection of ecosystem services across scenarios and two spatial scales: Europe (EU27 plus Norway and Switzerland) and a case study in Scotland. Outputs of the CLIMSAVE Integrated Assessment Platform (IAP) for multiple land-based sectors were used to test whether clusters of adaptation options referred to as policy archetypes reduced vulnerability to climate and socio-economic change for ecosystem service indicators related to biodiversity, flooding, water exploitation, land use diversity, land use intensity and food provision. The results show that the People-based Adaptation archetype is the most robust. This is because it reduces vulnerability by increasing coping capacity (people learn and build networks) and not only by reducing the impacts of climate and socio-economic change. By allowing comparative levels of vulnerability to be explored across sectors and scenarios, the CLIMSAVE approach provides a flexible tool for decision-makers and other stakeholders to increase understanding of which mixes of adaptation measures are robust responses to climate change. |
| spellingShingle | Jager, J Rounsevell, M Harrison, P Omann, I Dunford, R Kammerlander, M Pataki, G Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| title | Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| title_full | Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| title_fullStr | Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| title_short | Assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| title_sort | assessing policy robustness of climate change adaptation measures across sectors and scenarios |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jagerj assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios AT rounsevellm assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios AT harrisonp assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios AT omanni assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios AT dunfordr assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios AT kammerlanderm assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios AT patakig assessingpolicyrobustnessofclimatechangeadaptationmeasuresacrosssectorsandscenarios |