Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism

<p>This thesis offers a detailed analysis of Diderot and d'Holbach's argument for determinism, identifying its building blocks in the Causal Principle, Causal Necessitation, and the Laws of Nature. Diderot and d'Holbach's argument differs significantly from present-day ones...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Sciuto, R
Autres auteurs: Cronk, N
Format: Thèse
Publié: 2018
_version_ 1826316412353773568
author Sciuto, R
author2 Cronk, N
author_facet Cronk, N
Sciuto, R
author_sort Sciuto, R
collection OXFORD
description <p>This thesis offers a detailed analysis of Diderot and d'Holbach's argument for determinism, identifying its building blocks in the Causal Principle, Causal Necessitation, and the Laws of Nature. Diderot and d'Holbach's argument differs significantly from present-day ones and may therefore problematise our modern understanding of determinism.</p> <p>This work next examines how determinism affects both thinkers' ideas about ethics and society, paying considerable attention to their rejection of the notion of Moral Freedom, and to aesthetic and political questions. Finally, it examines those aspects of Diderot's and d'Holbach's thought that seemingly undermine their theory of determinism (for example, their complex understanding of causality); these aspects, however, may be easily reconciled with Diderot and d'Holbach's faith in determinism, given that both thinkers posit the existence of a gap between ontology and epistemology, between reality and humans' perception of it.</p> <p>This thesis sheds new light on Diderot and d'Holbach's metaphysics and on their position in relation to key figures in European philosophy, including Aquinas, Hobbes, Spinoza, Malebranche, Leibniz, and Hume. By identifying connections between Diderot and d'Holbach on the one hand, and thinkers such as Malebranche on the other, this work argues for a reconsideration of the Christian component of Diderot's and d'Holbach's culture, and it also challenges Jonathan Israel's notion of 'Radical Enlightenment'.</p> <p>This thesis further highlights similarities and differences between Diderot's and d'Holbach's writings and philosophy, concluding that, whilst the two thinkers may disagree on specific points, their general attitude towards such notions as determinism, causation, and freedom, is ultimately very similar. The Enlightenment is a period that favours intellectual exchange and collaboration, and Diderot's and d'Holbach's works, as the product of a collaborative philosophical enquiry, perfectly exemplify this phenomenon.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:12:56Z
format Thesis
id oxford-uuid:3ecba6e8-81cb-42f5-b02e-3e67dc960fcf
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:44:41Z
publishDate 2018
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3ecba6e8-81cb-42f5-b02e-3e67dc960fcf2024-12-07T16:12:47ZDiderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinismThesishttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06uuid:3ecba6e8-81cb-42f5-b02e-3e67dc960fcfORA Deposit2018Sciuto, RCronk, N<p>This thesis offers a detailed analysis of Diderot and d'Holbach's argument for determinism, identifying its building blocks in the Causal Principle, Causal Necessitation, and the Laws of Nature. Diderot and d'Holbach's argument differs significantly from present-day ones and may therefore problematise our modern understanding of determinism.</p> <p>This work next examines how determinism affects both thinkers' ideas about ethics and society, paying considerable attention to their rejection of the notion of Moral Freedom, and to aesthetic and political questions. Finally, it examines those aspects of Diderot's and d'Holbach's thought that seemingly undermine their theory of determinism (for example, their complex understanding of causality); these aspects, however, may be easily reconciled with Diderot and d'Holbach's faith in determinism, given that both thinkers posit the existence of a gap between ontology and epistemology, between reality and humans' perception of it.</p> <p>This thesis sheds new light on Diderot and d'Holbach's metaphysics and on their position in relation to key figures in European philosophy, including Aquinas, Hobbes, Spinoza, Malebranche, Leibniz, and Hume. By identifying connections between Diderot and d'Holbach on the one hand, and thinkers such as Malebranche on the other, this work argues for a reconsideration of the Christian component of Diderot's and d'Holbach's culture, and it also challenges Jonathan Israel's notion of 'Radical Enlightenment'.</p> <p>This thesis further highlights similarities and differences between Diderot's and d'Holbach's writings and philosophy, concluding that, whilst the two thinkers may disagree on specific points, their general attitude towards such notions as determinism, causation, and freedom, is ultimately very similar. The Enlightenment is a period that favours intellectual exchange and collaboration, and Diderot's and d'Holbach's works, as the product of a collaborative philosophical enquiry, perfectly exemplify this phenomenon.</p>
spellingShingle Sciuto, R
Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism
title Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism
title_full Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism
title_fullStr Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism
title_full_unstemmed Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism
title_short Diderot and d’Holbach: a theory of determinism
title_sort diderot and d holbach a theory of determinism
work_keys_str_mv AT sciutor diderotanddholbachatheoryofdeterminism