Coercion and the credibility of assurances

What makes coercion succeed? For most international relations scholars, the answer is credible threats. Yet scholars have neglected a second key component of successful coercion: credible assurances. This article makes two contributions to our understanding of coercion and credible assurances. First...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cebul, MD, Dafoe, A, Monteiro, NP
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Press 2021
_version_ 1797106793751511040
author Cebul, MD
Dafoe, A
Monteiro, NP
author_facet Cebul, MD
Dafoe, A
Monteiro, NP
author_sort Cebul, MD
collection OXFORD
description What makes coercion succeed? For most international relations scholars, the answer is credible threats. Yet scholars have neglected a second key component of successful coercion: credible assurances. This article makes two contributions to our understanding of coercion and credible assurances. First, we offer a theoretical framework exploring the causes and consequences of assurance credibility. In order to coerce the target, a challenger must issue both credible threats that defiance will be met with punishment, and credible assurances that compliance will be met with restraint. In turn, the credibility of assurances is determined by power and a reputation for restraint. Whereas greater power boosts credible threats, it undermines credible assurances. Therefore, powerful states must cultivate a reputation for restraint in order to issue credible assurances. Second, we provide empirical support for our claims through a nationally representative, scenario-based survey experiment that explores how US citizens respond to a hypothetical coercive dispute with China.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:07:31Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3ee588f8-f92f-41e6-95dd-36d00011829d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:07:31Z
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Chicago Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3ee588f8-f92f-41e6-95dd-36d00011829d2022-05-20T11:14:49ZCoercion and the credibility of assurancesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3ee588f8-f92f-41e6-95dd-36d00011829dEnglishSymplectic ElementsUniversity of Chicago Press 2021Cebul, MDDafoe, AMonteiro, NPWhat makes coercion succeed? For most international relations scholars, the answer is credible threats. Yet scholars have neglected a second key component of successful coercion: credible assurances. This article makes two contributions to our understanding of coercion and credible assurances. First, we offer a theoretical framework exploring the causes and consequences of assurance credibility. In order to coerce the target, a challenger must issue both credible threats that defiance will be met with punishment, and credible assurances that compliance will be met with restraint. In turn, the credibility of assurances is determined by power and a reputation for restraint. Whereas greater power boosts credible threats, it undermines credible assurances. Therefore, powerful states must cultivate a reputation for restraint in order to issue credible assurances. Second, we provide empirical support for our claims through a nationally representative, scenario-based survey experiment that explores how US citizens respond to a hypothetical coercive dispute with China.
spellingShingle Cebul, MD
Dafoe, A
Monteiro, NP
Coercion and the credibility of assurances
title Coercion and the credibility of assurances
title_full Coercion and the credibility of assurances
title_fullStr Coercion and the credibility of assurances
title_full_unstemmed Coercion and the credibility of assurances
title_short Coercion and the credibility of assurances
title_sort coercion and the credibility of assurances
work_keys_str_mv AT cebulmd coercionandthecredibilityofassurances
AT dafoea coercionandthecredibilityofassurances
AT monteironp coercionandthecredibilityofassurances