Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice

David Miller’s methodological approach to theorising about justice, articulated most explicitly in Principles of Social Justice (1999) but informing his work up to and including the recent Strangers in Our Midst (2016), takes people’s existing beliefs and sentiments – ‘what the people think’ – to pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baderin, A, Busen, A, Schramme, T, Ulas, L, Miller, D
Format: Journal article
Published: Palgrave Macmillan UK 2017
_version_ 1797064377009963008
author Baderin, A
Busen, A
Schramme, T
Ulas, L
Miller, D
author_facet Baderin, A
Busen, A
Schramme, T
Ulas, L
Miller, D
author_sort Baderin, A
collection OXFORD
description David Miller’s methodological approach to theorising about justice, articulated most explicitly in Principles of Social Justice (1999) but informing his work up to and including the recent Strangers in Our Midst (2016), takes people’s existing beliefs and sentiments – ‘what the people think’ – to play a fundamental constitutive role in the development of normative principles of justice. In this critical exchange, Alice Baderin, Andreas Busen, Thomas Schramme and Luke Ulas¸ subject differing aspects of this methodology to critique, before Miller responds.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:13:24Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:3ef213d7-a6f7-4709-9a19-2c3f430ecfc7
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:13:24Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Palgrave Macmillan UK
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:3ef213d7-a6f7-4709-9a19-2c3f430ecfc72022-03-26T14:28:52ZWho cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justiceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3ef213d7-a6f7-4709-9a19-2c3f430ecfc7Symplectic Elements at OxfordPalgrave Macmillan UK2017Baderin, ABusen, ASchramme, TUlas, LMiller, DDavid Miller’s methodological approach to theorising about justice, articulated most explicitly in Principles of Social Justice (1999) but informing his work up to and including the recent Strangers in Our Midst (2016), takes people’s existing beliefs and sentiments – ‘what the people think’ – to play a fundamental constitutive role in the development of normative principles of justice. In this critical exchange, Alice Baderin, Andreas Busen, Thomas Schramme and Luke Ulas¸ subject differing aspects of this methodology to critique, before Miller responds.
spellingShingle Baderin, A
Busen, A
Schramme, T
Ulas, L
Miller, D
Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice
title Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice
title_full Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice
title_fullStr Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice
title_full_unstemmed Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice
title_short Who cares what the people think? Revisiting David Miller’s approach to theorising about justice
title_sort who cares what the people think revisiting david miller s approach to theorising about justice
work_keys_str_mv AT baderina whocareswhatthepeoplethinkrevisitingdavidmillersapproachtotheorisingaboutjustice
AT busena whocareswhatthepeoplethinkrevisitingdavidmillersapproachtotheorisingaboutjustice
AT schrammet whocareswhatthepeoplethinkrevisitingdavidmillersapproachtotheorisingaboutjustice
AT ulasl whocareswhatthepeoplethinkrevisitingdavidmillersapproachtotheorisingaboutjustice
AT millerd whocareswhatthepeoplethinkrevisitingdavidmillersapproachtotheorisingaboutjustice