Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain
Widespread afforestation has been proposed internationally to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide; however, the specific hydrological consequences and benefits of such large-scale afforestation (e.g. natural flood management) are poorly understood. We use a high-resolution land surface model, the Join...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Geosciences Union
2024
|
| _version_ | 1824458978226077696 |
|---|---|
| author | Buechel, M Slater, L Dadson, S |
| author_facet | Buechel, M Slater, L Dadson, S |
| author_sort | Buechel, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Widespread afforestation has been proposed internationally to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide; however, the specific hydrological consequences and benefits of such large-scale afforestation (e.g. natural flood management) are poorly understood. We use a high-resolution land surface model, the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), with realistic potential afforestation scenarios to quantify possible hydrological change across Great Britain in both present and projected climate. We assess whether proposed afforestation produces significantly different regional responses across regions; whether hydrological fluxes, stores and events are significantly altered by afforestation relative to climate; and how future hydrological processes may be altered up to 2050. Additionally, this enables determination of the relative sensitivity of land surface process representation in JULES compared to climate changes. For these three aims we run simulations using (i) past climate with proposed land cover changes and known floods and drought events; (ii) past climate with independent changes in precipitation, temperature, and CO<sub>2</sub>; and (iii) a potential future climate (2020–2050). We find the proposed scale of afforestation is unlikely to significantly alter regional hydrology; however, it can noticeably decrease low flows whilst not reducing high flows. The afforestation levels minimally impact hydrological processes compared to changes in precipitation, temperature, and CO<sub>2</sub>. Warming average temperatures (+3 °C) decreases streamflow, while rising precipitation (130 %) and CO<sub>2</sub> (600 ppm) increase streamflow. Changes in high flow are generated because of evaporative parameterizations, whereas low flows are controlled by runoff model parameterizations. In this study, land surface parameters within a land surface model do not substantially alter hydrological processes when compared to climate. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:34:28Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:3f56eb7a-bb3e-48c0-bba2-c6a24c44d0a1 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T04:34:28Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | European Geosciences Union |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:3f56eb7a-bb3e-48c0-bba2-c6a24c44d0a12025-01-23T12:32:53ZBroadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great BritainJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:3f56eb7a-bb3e-48c0-bba2-c6a24c44d0a1EnglishSymplectic ElementsEuropean Geosciences Union2024Buechel, MSlater, LDadson, SWidespread afforestation has been proposed internationally to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide; however, the specific hydrological consequences and benefits of such large-scale afforestation (e.g. natural flood management) are poorly understood. We use a high-resolution land surface model, the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), with realistic potential afforestation scenarios to quantify possible hydrological change across Great Britain in both present and projected climate. We assess whether proposed afforestation produces significantly different regional responses across regions; whether hydrological fluxes, stores and events are significantly altered by afforestation relative to climate; and how future hydrological processes may be altered up to 2050. Additionally, this enables determination of the relative sensitivity of land surface process representation in JULES compared to climate changes. For these three aims we run simulations using (i) past climate with proposed land cover changes and known floods and drought events; (ii) past climate with independent changes in precipitation, temperature, and CO<sub>2</sub>; and (iii) a potential future climate (2020–2050). We find the proposed scale of afforestation is unlikely to significantly alter regional hydrology; however, it can noticeably decrease low flows whilst not reducing high flows. The afforestation levels minimally impact hydrological processes compared to changes in precipitation, temperature, and CO<sub>2</sub>. Warming average temperatures (+3 °C) decreases streamflow, while rising precipitation (130 %) and CO<sub>2</sub> (600 ppm) increase streamflow. Changes in high flow are generated because of evaporative parameterizations, whereas low flows are controlled by runoff model parameterizations. In this study, land surface parameters within a land surface model do not substantially alter hydrological processes when compared to climate. |
| spellingShingle | Buechel, M Slater, L Dadson, S Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain |
| title | Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain |
| title_full | Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain |
| title_fullStr | Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain |
| title_full_unstemmed | Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain |
| title_short | Broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in Great Britain |
| title_sort | broadleaf afforestation impacts on terrestrial hydrology insignificant compared to climate change in great britain |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT buechelm broadleafafforestationimpactsonterrestrialhydrologyinsignificantcomparedtoclimatechangeingreatbritain AT slaterl broadleafafforestationimpactsonterrestrialhydrologyinsignificantcomparedtoclimatechangeingreatbritain AT dadsons broadleafafforestationimpactsonterrestrialhydrologyinsignificantcomparedtoclimatechangeingreatbritain |