Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.

Outcome selection bias in meta-analysis.

Publication bias has been previously identified as a threat to the validity of a meta-analysis. Recently, new evidence has documented an additional threat to validity, the selective reporting of trial outcomes within published studies. Several diseases have several possible measures of outcome. Some...

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Williamson, P, Gamble, C, Altman, D, Hutton, J
Format:	Journal article
Jezik:	English
Izdano:	2005

Podobne knjige/članki

Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
od: Saini, P, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists.
od: Smyth, R, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Assessing the potential for bias in meta-analysis due to selective reporting of subgroup analyses within studies.
od: Hahn, S, et al.
Izdano: (2000)

Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
od: Kirkham, J, et al.
Izdano: (2018)

The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
od: Kirkham, J, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists
od: Smyth, RMD, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Application and investigation of a bound for outcome reporting bias
od: Gamble Carrol, et al.
Izdano: (2007-03-01)

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
od: Kirkham, J, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
od: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Izdano: (2013-01-01)

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias.
od: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Izdano: (2008-08-01)

Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.
od: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Izdano: (2010-03-01)

Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorial
od: Powell Colin, et al.
Izdano: (2010-05-01)

Models for potentially biased evidence in meta-analysis using empirically based priors
od: Welton, N, et al.
Izdano: (2009)

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study.
od: Wood, L, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Reporting of clinical trials: a review of research funders' guidelines.
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Outcome reporting bias in government-funded RCTs - Reply
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials - Comment
od: Altman, D
Izdano: (2005)

Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2014)

Selection bias in the reported performances of AD classification pipelines
od: Alex F. Mendelson, et al.
Izdano: (2017-01-01)

Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Selection bias in meta-analyses of gene-disease associations.
od: Jin Ling Tang
Izdano: (2005-12-01)

Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
od: Higgins, J, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

The need for consensus, consistency, and core outcome sets in perioperative research.
od: Blazeby, J, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
od: Chan, A, et al.
Izdano: (2004)

Real-time analysis and selection biases in the Supernova Legacy Survey
od: Perrett, K, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

REAL-TIME ANALYSIS AND SELECTION BIASES IN THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY
od: Perrett, K, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.
od: Mavridis, D, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. I: Continuous outcomes.
od: Curtin, F, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. II: Binary outcomes.
od: Curtin, F, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over clinical trials. II: Binary outcomes.
od: Curtin, F, et al.
Izdano: (2002)

Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)
od: Carole Lunny, et al.
Izdano: (2024-01-01)

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials.
od: Dwan, K, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Reporting bias in diagnostic and prognostic studies: time for action.
od: Rifai, N, et al.
Izdano: (2008)

Publication bias in meta-analysis : prevention, assessment and adjustments /
od: Rothstein, Hannah R, et al.
Izdano: (2005)

Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ
od: Sara Schroter, et al.
Izdano: (2016-04-01)

Systematic review: bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity.
od: Boone, D, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Systematic review: Bias in imaging studies - the effect of manipulating clinical context, recall bias and reporting intensity
od: Boone, D, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

Investigating selection bias of online surveys on coronavirus-related behavioral outcomes
od: Ines Schaurer, et al.
Izdano: (2020-06-01)

Sensitivity analysis of selection bias: a graphical display by bias-correction index
od: Ping-Chen Chung, et al.
Izdano: (2023-11-01)