Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
المؤلف الرئيسي: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Journal article |
اللغة: | English |
منشور في: |
2013
|
مواد مشابهة
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
حسب: Sheehan, M, وآخرون
منشور في: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
حسب: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, وآخرون
منشور في: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
حسب: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., وآخرون
منشور في: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
حسب: Živojinović Dragica
منشور في: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
منشور في: (2012)