Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Autor principal: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicat: |
2013
|
Ítems similars
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
per: Sheehan, M, et al.
Publicat: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
per: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Publicat: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
per: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Publicat: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
per: Živojinović Dragica
Publicat: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Publicat: (2012)