Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Hovedforfatter: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Sprog: | English |
Udgivet: |
2013
|
Lignende værker
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
af: Sheehan, M, et al.
Udgivet: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
af: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Udgivet: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
af: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Udgivet: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
af: Živojinović Dragica
Udgivet: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Udgivet: (2012)