Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Μορφή: | Journal article |
Γλώσσα: | English |
Έκδοση: |
2013
|
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
Παρόμοια τεκμήρια
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
ανά: Sheehan, M, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
ανά: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
ανά: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., κ.ά.
Έκδοση: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
ανά: Živojinović Dragica
Έκδοση: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Έκδοση: (2012)