Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Egile nagusia: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Formatua: | Journal article |
Hizkuntza: | English |
Argitaratua: |
2013
|
Antzeko izenburuak
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
nork: Sheehan, M, et al.
Argitaratua: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
nork: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Argitaratua: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
nork: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Argitaratua: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
nork: Živojinović Dragica
Argitaratua: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Argitaratua: (2012)