Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Auteur principal: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Langue: | English |
Publié: |
2013
|
Documents similaires
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
par: Sheehan, M, et autres
Publié: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
par: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et autres
Publié: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
par: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et autres
Publié: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
par: Živojinović Dragica
Publié: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Publié: (2012)