Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Autor principal: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
2013
|
Registros relacionados
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
por: Sheehan, M, et al.
Publicado em: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
por: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, et al.
Publicado em: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
por: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., et al.
Publicado em: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
por: Živojinović Dragica
Publicado em: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Publicado em: (2012)