Getting the justification for research ethics review right.
Dyck and Allen claim that the current model for mandatory ethical review of research involving human participants is unethical once the harms that accrue from the review process are identified. However, the assumptions upon which the authors assert that this model of research ethics governance is ju...
Автор: | Dunn, M |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
2013
|
Схожі ресурси
-
Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
за авторством: Sheehan, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2018) -
Entropy as the main justification for research in medical ethics
за авторством: Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian, та інші
Опубліковано: (2022-05-01) -
The ethical justification for the use of animals in biomedical research
за авторством: Kostomitsopoulos N.G., та інші
Опубліковано: (2010-01-01) -
Requirements for ethical justification of clinical trials
за авторством: Živojinović Dragica
Опубліковано: (2012-01-01) -
Territorial Rights: Concept and Justification
Опубліковано: (2012)