Interpreting people and interpreting texts

What is the relation between interpreting a person's speech and actions, on the one hand, and interpreting a written text, on the other? That question is considered in connection with the theories of interpretation offered by Donald Davidson and Paul Ricoeur. There are some important similariti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Child, W
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2006
Subjects:
_version_ 1797065023808339968
author Child, W
author_facet Child, W
author_sort Child, W
collection OXFORD
description What is the relation between interpreting a person's speech and actions, on the one hand, and interpreting a written text, on the other? That question is considered in connection with the theories of interpretation offered by Donald Davidson and Paul Ricoeur. There are some important similarities between those theories. However, it is argued that Davidson and Ricoeur are divided on fundamental questions about the relation between meaning and intention, about the reference of texts, about the relation between the meanings of texts and the meanings of spoken words, and about the notion of correctness that applies to interpretation. On each of these points, it is contended, Davidson has the better of the dispute.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T21:22:42Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:4203196b-a440-4993-a673-cf0d8a5ef8ae
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T21:22:42Z
publishDate 2006
publisher Routledge
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:4203196b-a440-4993-a673-cf0d8a5ef8ae2022-03-26T14:47:00ZInterpreting people and interpreting textsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4203196b-a440-4993-a673-cf0d8a5ef8aePhilosophyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetRoutledge2006Child, WWhat is the relation between interpreting a person's speech and actions, on the one hand, and interpreting a written text, on the other? That question is considered in connection with the theories of interpretation offered by Donald Davidson and Paul Ricoeur. There are some important similarities between those theories. However, it is argued that Davidson and Ricoeur are divided on fundamental questions about the relation between meaning and intention, about the reference of texts, about the relation between the meanings of texts and the meanings of spoken words, and about the notion of correctness that applies to interpretation. On each of these points, it is contended, Davidson has the better of the dispute.
spellingShingle Philosophy
Child, W
Interpreting people and interpreting texts
title Interpreting people and interpreting texts
title_full Interpreting people and interpreting texts
title_fullStr Interpreting people and interpreting texts
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting people and interpreting texts
title_short Interpreting people and interpreting texts
title_sort interpreting people and interpreting texts
topic Philosophy
work_keys_str_mv AT childw interpretingpeopleandinterpretingtexts