Interpreting people and interpreting texts
What is the relation between interpreting a person's speech and actions, on the one hand, and interpreting a written text, on the other? That question is considered in connection with the theories of interpretation offered by Donald Davidson and Paul Ricoeur. There are some important similariti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Routledge
2006
|
Subjects: |
_version_ | 1797065023808339968 |
---|---|
author | Child, W |
author_facet | Child, W |
author_sort | Child, W |
collection | OXFORD |
description | What is the relation between interpreting a person's speech and actions, on the one hand, and interpreting a written text, on the other? That question is considered in connection with the theories of interpretation offered by Donald Davidson and Paul Ricoeur. There are some important similarities between those theories. However, it is argued that Davidson and Ricoeur are divided on fundamental questions about the relation between meaning and intention, about the reference of texts, about the relation between the meanings of texts and the meanings of spoken words, and about the notion of correctness that applies to interpretation. On each of these points, it is contended, Davidson has the better of the dispute. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:22:42Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:4203196b-a440-4993-a673-cf0d8a5ef8ae |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T21:22:42Z |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:4203196b-a440-4993-a673-cf0d8a5ef8ae2022-03-26T14:47:00ZInterpreting people and interpreting textsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:4203196b-a440-4993-a673-cf0d8a5ef8aePhilosophyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetRoutledge2006Child, WWhat is the relation between interpreting a person's speech and actions, on the one hand, and interpreting a written text, on the other? That question is considered in connection with the theories of interpretation offered by Donald Davidson and Paul Ricoeur. There are some important similarities between those theories. However, it is argued that Davidson and Ricoeur are divided on fundamental questions about the relation between meaning and intention, about the reference of texts, about the relation between the meanings of texts and the meanings of spoken words, and about the notion of correctness that applies to interpretation. On each of these points, it is contended, Davidson has the better of the dispute. |
spellingShingle | Philosophy Child, W Interpreting people and interpreting texts |
title | Interpreting people and interpreting texts |
title_full | Interpreting people and interpreting texts |
title_fullStr | Interpreting people and interpreting texts |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpreting people and interpreting texts |
title_short | Interpreting people and interpreting texts |
title_sort | interpreting people and interpreting texts |
topic | Philosophy |
work_keys_str_mv | AT childw interpretingpeopleandinterpretingtexts |