Limited engagement with transparent and open science standards in the policies of pain journals: a cross-sectional evaluation
Scientific progress requires transparency and openness. The ability to critique, replicate and implement scientific findings depends on the transparency of the study design and methods, and the open availability of study materials, data and code. Journals are key stakeholders in supporting transpare...
Main Authors: | Cashin, AG, Bagg, MK, Richards, GC, Toomey, E, McAuley, JH, Lee, H |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Similar Items
-
Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study: Open science policies of medical journals
by: Gardener, AD, et al.
Published: (2022) -
A systematic review highlights the need to improve the quality and applicability of trials of physical therapy interventions for low back pain
by: Cashin, AG, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Disentangling contextual effects from musculoskeletal treatments
by: Cashin, AG, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Reproducible and replicable pain research: a critical review
by: Lee, H, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Items for consideration in a reporting guideline for mediation analyses: a Delphi study
by: Cashin, AG, et al.
Published: (2020)