Is English consequence compact?
By mimicking the standard definition for a formal language, we define what it is for a natural language to be compact. We set out a valid English argument none of whose finite subarguments is valid. We consider one by one objections to the argument's logical validity and then dismiss them. The...
Main Authors: | Paseau, A, Griffiths, O |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021
|
Similar Items
-
Capturing consequence
by: Paseau, A
Published: (2019) -
Proofs of the Compactness Theorem
by: Paseau, A
Published: (2010) -
Proofs of the Compactness Theorem (vol 31, pg 73, 2010)
by: Paseau, A
Published: (2011) -
Isomorphism invariance and overgeneration
by: Griffiths, O, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Ways of being and logicality
by: Griffiths, O, et al.
Published: (2023)